Coram closed W.P.No.27775 of 1996, RC Nos.2 and 3 of 1997 as the cause of action did not survive for adjudication due to passage of time and lack of instructions from petitioner counsel, granting liberty to seek revival if cause survives.
Closed Writ Petition and RCs with liberty to petitioners to seek revival if cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T. VI NOD KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE PULLA KARTHI K
W.P.No.27775 of 1996, RC Nos.2 and 3 of 1997
COMMON ORDER :(per Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Vinod Kumar)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the
1st petitioner has since deceased and insofar as the 2nd petitioner is concerned, though he has addressed a letter, the same has been returned with postal endorsement ‘not found’. Therefore, he submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
for the respondents, on the other hand, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition as well as in RCs, which are preferred at the instance of the petitioners, may not survive for adjudication by this Court, due to passage of time.
2
However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to seek revival, in the event
cause survives.
closed. No order as to costs.
__________________ T. VI NOD KUMAR, J
Date:16.11.2022
_________________ PULLA KARTHI K, J
GJ
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T. VI NOD KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE PULLA KARTHI K
W.P.No.27775 of 1996, RC Nos.2 and 3 of 1997
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Vinod Kumar)
16.11.2022
GJ
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the causes of action in the writ petition and revisional complaints which relate to years 1996 and 1997 survive for adjudication due to passage of time along with lack of instructions from pet
Whether the writ petition and revisional complaints (RC Nos. 2 and 3 of 1997) should be closed given the lack of instructions.
Petitioners
Respondents
T. VINOD KUMAR
PULLA KARTHI K
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
