Allowed

R Sudhakar Reddy v. The Special Deputy Collector

Telangana HC22 Sept 2022LAAS/393/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Common appeals in land acquisition proceedings for an irrigation scheme were disposed of by applying a prior judgment to enhance market value by two more times (1+2) the L.A.O. valuation with consequential benefits under the amended Act.

What did the court decide?

Enhancing the market value of acquired land by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act.

R Sudhakar Reddy Vs The Special Deputy Collector — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶2

AND

¶3

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI

¶4

L.A.A.S.Nos.175, 184, 189, 197, 198, 227, 231, 248, 251, 269, 312, 325, 343, 347, 351, 359, 366, 367, 376, 393, 394, 398 and

¶5

483 of 2016

¶6

COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Justice G. Sri Devi)

¶7

The lis in this batch of Appeals preferred by the claimants pertain to common acquisition proceedings and therefore, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the claimants and Sri D.Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent. Perused the material available on record.

¶9

The present acquisition was for the purpose of Rajeev Lift Irrigation Scheme, Phase-II, Pebbair, which is ancillary project of Priyadarshini Joorala Project. This Court vide judgment, dated 15.09.2022 has already elaborately analysed the evidence and considered the identical issue raised in these appeals in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016. Both the counsel have not disputed the factum of commonality of the evidence and the issue in these

¶10

¶11

appeals and in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016, wherein this Court has allowed the appeal enhancing the market value by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act.

¶12

Therefore, following the judgment passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016, dated 15.09.2022 and for the reasons stated therein, all these appeals stand allowed by enhancing the market value of the acquired land by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits

¶13

as stipulated under the amended Act. No order as to costs.

¶14

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶15

_____________________ JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶16

________________________ JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI

¶17

22.09.2022 gkv/tsr Note: Office to append a copy of the judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 with the present judgment. B/o gkv/tsr

¶18

R Sudhakar Reddy v. The Special Deputy Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R Sudhakar Reddy v. The Special Deputy Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Land Acquisition Officer, Adilabad Dist. Vs Tallapalli Linga Rao and 37 Others

G.Vinod Kumar Reddy, Rr Dist Vs G.Suhasini, Hyd

The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Vs G.Jeeveshwar

Buggapally Sayamma Vs The Special Deputy Collector and 39 Others

Pothupalli Yadaiah, Vs The Special Deputy Collector (La)

J.Balaiah Vs The Special Deputy Collector (La)