Allowed

Nakka Shankaramma v. The Special Deputy Collector (La)

Telangana HC22 Sept 2022LAAS/198/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compensation for land acquired for an irrigation scheme was enhanced to three times the Land Acquisition Officer's valuation, with consequential statutory benefits. The court allowed all appeals following its decision concerning the identical acquisition issue. The decrees excluded interest for the respective delays in filing the appeals.

What did the court decide?

Market value enhanced to three times the L.A.O.'s valuation with consequential statutory benefits, excluding interest for the respective appeal-delay periods; no costs.

Nakka Shankaramma Vs The Special Deputy Collector (La) — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY,^{THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER} rWO THOUSNND^{AND TWENTYTWO}

¶3

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE^{JUSTICE G SRI OEVI} And THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICEM.G.PRIYADARSINI}

¶4

227, 231.248,^{251,269,312, 325, 343.} L.A.A.S.^{Nos: 175,184,189,197.198.} 347.351.3^{59,366,367,376. 393,394.398 AND la30F 2016}

¶5

L.A.A.S .^{No:175oF 2016:}

¶6

Appeal under^{Section 54 of Land AcquisitionAct against the Judgment} and Decree^{daled 22-04-2014made in O P NO'309of 2013on the file of the} court of the^{Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶7

D.T.Balaraiu,^{S/o.Satyanarayana}

¶8

...AppellanUClaimant

¶9

AND

¶10

The Soecial Deputy^{Collector, L'A , Raieev Lift lrrigationScheme'Phase - ll'} peuudir, Maha6ubiragar District'

¶11

.. . RespondenURespondent

¶12

L.A.A.S. No:184^{oF 2016:}

¶13

Appeal under^{Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated 20-03-2013 made in O'P'NO'410of 2O12on the file of the} court of the^{Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶14

D.Hanmanth,^S/o.Subhan

¶15

...AppellanUClaimant

¶16

AND

¶17

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L'A', Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme'Phase- ll'} peOudir, Maha6ubiragar District' ...RespondenURespondent

¶18

L.A.A.S. No:189 OF 2016

¶19

Appeal under Section 54 of^{LandAcquisitionAct against the Judgment} and Decree dated 23-04-2014^{made in O.P.NO.436 of 2012 on the file of the} court of the Senior Crvil Judge, Wanaparthy^District. Between:

¶20

Golla Mekala Buka Srinu, S/o.^Balaiah

¶21

...AppellanUC laimant

¶22

AND

¶23

The Special Deputy Collector,^{L A} Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase^- ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District

¶24

... RespondenURespondent

¶25

L.A.A.S. No:197 OF 2016:

¶26

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition^{Act againstthe Judgment} and Decree dated 20-03-2013^{made in O.P.NO.347 ot 2012 on the file of the} court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy^District. Between:

¶27

J.Balaiah, S/o. Pentaiah

¶28

...Appella nUClaimant

¶29

AND

¶30

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev^{Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶31

... RespondenUResPondent

¶32

L.A.A.S. No:198 OF 2016:

¶33

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition^{Act againstthe Judgment} and Decree dated 21-04-2O14^{made in O.P.NO.12 of 2013 on the file of the} court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy^District. Between:

¶34

Nakka China Sankharamma, Wo.Nakka Naganna

¶35

...AppellanUClaima nt

¶36

AND

¶37

The Special Deputy^{Collector'1.A., RajeevLift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - ll'} Pebbdir, Mahabubnagar^District. ... RespondenURespondent

¶38

L.A.A.S. No:227 OF²⁰¹⁶¹

¶39

Appeal under^{Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} andDecreedated20-03-2013madeino.P.No.405of2012onthefileofthe court of the^{Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶40

D.Kistanna,^S/o.Suban

¶41

...AppellanUClaimant

¶42

AND

¶43

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - ll'} Pebbdir, Mahabubnagar^District. ...RespondenURespondent

¶44

L.A.A.S. No:231^{OF 2016:}

¶45

Appeal under^{Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} andDecreedated23-04-20,14madeino.P.No.435of2012onthefileofthe court of the Senior^{Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'}

¶46

Between

¶47

Yatagiri Anjaneyulu,^{S/o.Y.Kistanna}

¶48

...AppellanUClaimant

¶49

AND

¶50

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme' Phase - ll'} pebbdir, Mahabubnagar District. ... RespondenURespondent

¶51

L.A.A.S No:24^{8 0F 2016}

¶52

Appeal under^{Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated 20-03-2013made in O P NO 345 of 2012 on the file of the} court of the^{Senior Civil Judge'Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶53

Yatagiri^{Balaswamy,S/o.Yatagiri Balaiah}

¶54

...AppellanUClaimaf^t

¶55

AND

¶56

The Special^{DeputyCollector'L A'' Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - ll'} Pebbdir, Mahabubnagar^District ... RespondenURespondent

¶57

L.A.A.S^{. No:251oF 2016:}

¶58

Appeal under^{Section54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated 20-03-2013made in O P'NO 361 of 2O12on the file of the} court of the^{SeniorCivil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶59

Kadire Masanna,^S/o.Kistanna

¶60

...AppellanUC^laimant

¶61

AND

¶62

The Special^{DeputyCollector'L A RaieevLift lrrigationScheme'Phase- ll'} Pebudir, Mahabubnagar^District ...RespondenURespondent

¶63

L.A.A.S. No:269^{oF 2016:}

¶64

Appeal under^{Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated 22-04-2014 made in O P NO 29 of 2013 on the file of the} court of the^{SeniorCivil Judge, Wanaparthy District'}

¶65

Between:

¶66

Balaswamy, S/o.Pentaiah

...AppellanUClaimant

/../

AND

The Soecial^{DeputyCollector'L A'' Raieev Lift lnigation Scheme'Phase - ll'} pe6#i Manadubnagar^District ...RespondenURespondent

¶71

L.A.A. S.^{No:312 0F2016}

¶72

Appeal^{under Section54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated 09-03-2015 made in O P'NO'75 ol 2014 on the file of the} court of^{the SeniorCivil Judge'Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶73

Pothupalli^{Yadaiah' S/o Ramulu'}

¶74

Smt.^{Chandrakala,WoRavinder Goud'}

¶75

Rajeshwar^{Reddy,S/o Padmanabha Reddy'}

¶76

Ragotham^{Reddy,S/oPadmanabha Reddy'}

¶77

S. Ragnotnam^{Reddy,S/o'Padmanabha Reddy'}

¶78

Narotham^{Reddy,S/o'Padmanabha Reddy'}

¶79

Narotham^{Reddy' S/o'Padmanabha Reddy'}

¶80

Raieshwar^{Reddy' S/o'PadmanabhaReddy'}

¶81

Narotham^{Reddy,S/o Padmanabha Reddy'}

¶82

Ragotham^{Reddy,S/o'Padmanabha Reddy'} 11.Raieshwar^{Reddy,S/o Padmanabha Reddy'}

¶83

Naiotham^{Reddy,S/o'PadmanabhaReddy'}

¶84

Ragotham^{Reddy,S/o'Padrnanabha Reddy'}

¶85

Rajeshwar^{Reddy,S/o'PadmanabhaReddy'} 15.Ravula^{Janardhan Reddy' S/o Bucha Reddy'} 16.Ravula^{Janardhan Reddy' S/o Bucha Reddy'}

¶86

Ravula^{Janardhan Reddy' S/o Bucha Reddy'}

¶87

18.Smt.^{JYothi, Wo'RavinderGoud'}

¶88

R.Surendranath^{Reddy'S/o Kista Reddy}

¶89

...Appellants/Claimant^{9' 29' 35 to 50 &57}

¶90

AND

¶91

1 The Special^{DeputyCollector (LA)' RajivLift lrrigation Scheme'Phase-Tl} Pebndir, Mahabubnagar^District'

¶92

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶93

Ravula^{Narsimha Reddy,S/o Kista Reddy}

¶94

Regula^{Srinivasulu SR) Moulali}

¶95

Smt.^{P.Shantamma,Wo.Ramulu}

¶96

Shekar^{GoudS/o Bala Goud}

¶97

Telugu^{Kothakota Boya LaxmiS/o Manyarn}

¶98

Telugu Kothakota^{Boya ThirupathiS/e Manyam}

¶99

Boya^{Bala Peeramma,Wo Ramulu}

¶100

Ravinder^{Goud, S/o.BalaiahGoud}

¶101

P. Gandhi^{S/o Ramulu}

¶102

P. SatYanarayana^{S/o Ramulu}

¶103

Pothulapalli^{PentaiahS/oJambulaiah}

¶104

Pothulapalli^{AshokS/o Jambulaiah}

¶105

Bal Reddy,^{S/o R.Venkat Reddy (died) per L Rs Claimants NOI 5 to 17} and 61

¶106

R.Sunitha^{W/o RajeshwarReddY}

¶107

'16. R. Ashok ReddY S/o R.Bal ReddY

¶108

R.Aravind^{ReddyS/o R.BalReddy}

¶109

'18. k. Venkatamma Wo Kista ReddY

¶110

R.sudhakar^{ReddyW/o Kista Reddy}

¶111

R.GoPal^{ReddY Wo Kista ReddY}

¶112

21 . R.Vishnuvardhan^{Reddy W/o Kista Reddy}

¶113

22.f etugu^{KothaRamulu S/oChinna Naganna}

¶114

23.Aloor BoYa^{Bal Raju S/o Rarnulu}

¶115

24.V akiti Telugu^{SukkammaWoKarrenna}

¶116

25.Boya Buggapalli^{Venkatamma S/o Bal Ram}

¶117

.,/

¶118

-a

¶119

Pothulapalli Uppari^{Raju S/o BalaRam}

¶120

Pothulapalli^{RamuluS/o Hanumanth}

¶121

Bakka Laxmaiah^{S/o Hanumanth}

¶122

Golla Ramulu^{Wo Yerra Bataiah}

¶123

J.Bakkaiah^{S/o Pentaiah}

¶124

31 . Venkataiah^{S/o Pedda Balaiah}

¶125

Pasulu^{BoYa Ramulu,S/o Balaiah}

¶126

BuggaPalli^{Ravi, S/o Kondanna}

¶127

34.Vilaya^{LaxmiWo R.Prathap Reddy}

¶128

Chandra^{Shekhar Reddy S/o Bucha Reddy}

¶129

36.Vijaya Laxmi^{Wo R.Prathap Reddy}

¶130

3T.Chandra Shekhar^{Reddy S/o Bucha Reddy}

¶131

Vijaya^{LaxmiWo R.Prathap Reddy}

¶132

3g.Chandra^{Shekar ReddyS/oBucha Reddy}

¶133

Telugu Kotha^{Venkataiah S/o Savaraiah}

¶134

4't.P. Upperi Laxmi^Dio.Ramulu

¶135

42.B.Padma^{Wo Bandenna}

¶136

R.Savithrarnma.^{Wo R.Bal Reddy'}

¶137

( R 2 to R43 are not^{necessary parties)}

¶138

...Respondents

¶139

L.A.A.S. NO:3 25^{oF 2016:}

¶140

Appeal under^{Section 54 of Land AcquisitionAct against the Judgment} andDecreedated20-03-2013madeino.P.No.309of2Q12onthefileofthe court of the^{Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶141

Thokali NaraYana,^S/o.R.Ramulu

...AppellanUClaimant

:'-:._^' .x; ffi;

AND

The Special^{DeputyCollector' L.A , Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - il'} Pebbdir, Mahabubnagar^District

¶146

... RespondenURespondent

¶147

L.A.A^{.S. No :343 OF 2016:}

¶148

AppealUndersection54ofLandAcquisitionAclagainSttheJudgment and^{Decree daled 22-04-2014made in o.P.NO.27 0f 20120n the file of the} court^{of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶149

Golla^{Balaiah' S/o.Buchanna}

¶150

...AppellanUC laimant

¶151

AND

¶152

The Special^{DeputyCollector, L.A., RajeevLift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll'} Pebbiir' Mahabubnagar^District'

¶153

... RespondenuRespondent

¶154

L.A. A.S.^{No:347OF 2016:}

¶155

Appeal under^{Section 54 of LandAcquisition Act against the Judgment} and^{Decreedated 03-06-2014 made in o.P.NO.1010r 2013 0n the file of the} court^{of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶156

R.Hemavardhan^{Reddy, S/o.R.Narayanareddy}

¶157

...Ap pellanUC la^ima nt

¶158

AND

¶159

The Special^{DeputyCollector, L.A.'Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbdir'^{Mahabubnagar District}

¶160

... RespondenuRespondent

¶161

L.A.A.S.^{No:351OF 2016:}

¶162

Appeal under Section 54^{of LandAcquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated 03-06-2014 made in O.P.NO.60of 2013 on the file of the} court of^{the SeniorCivil Judge, Wanaparthy District.}

¶163

Between:

¶164

Pothulapally^{UppariJanardhan'S/o Balaram}

¶165

...AppellanUC laimant

¶166

AND

¶167

Tne Soecial^{DeputyCollector, L A , Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - ll'} pe[#r, Manatiubnagar^District' ...RespondenURespondent

¶168

L.A.A.S^{. No:359oF2016:}

¶169

Appeal^{under Section54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated 22-02-2013 made in O'P NO'277 ol 2012on the file of the} court of^{the SeniorCivil Judge' WanaparthyDistrict'} Between:

¶170

Thota Mahendra,^S/o'Balaiah

¶171

...AppellanUClaimant

¶172

AND

¶173

The Soecial^{DeputyColle-ctor,L'A , RajeevLift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - Il'} peiuir, furt atiubnagar^District' ...RespondenURespondent

¶174

L.A.A. .No^:36 F 2016:

¶175

Appeal^{under Section54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} andDecreedaled2l-02-2O13madeinO'P'NO'15lof2Ol2onthefileofthe court of^{the Senior CivilJudge' WanaparthyDistrict'} Between:

¶176

Ganigadi^{GollaBalaiah' S/o'Buddaiah}

¶177

...AppellanUClaimant

¶178

AND

¶179

The Soecial^{DeputyCollecto.r,L'A',RajeevLift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - ll'} pe[ffr, Matratiubiragar^District ...RespondenURespondent

¶180

L.A.A .S. No:367 OF^2016:

¶181

Appeal under Section^{54 of LandAcquisition Act against the Judgment} andDecreedaled2l-o2-2ol3madeino'P.No..145of2012onthefileofthe court of the Senior^{Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District} Between:

¶182

Ganigadi Golla^{Pentanna,S/o. Buchanna}

¶183

...APPellanUC^{laima nt}

¶184

AND

¶185

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - ll,} Pebbair' Mahabubnagar District

¶186

... RespondenuRespondent

¶187

L.A.A.S. No:376 OF 2016:

¶188

Appeal under Section^{54 of LandAcquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree dated^{21-02-201 3 made in o.P.NO.1780t 2012 0n the file of the} court of the Senior^{Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.} Between:

¶189

J.G. Buchanna. S/o.Pedda^{Golla Bandalaiah}

¶190

...APPella nUClaimant

¶191

AND

¶192

The Special Deputy Collector,^{L.A., Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase- ll,} Pebbdir' Mahabubnagar District

¶193

... RespondenuRespondent

¶194

L.A.A.S^. No:393 OF^2016:

¶195

Appeal under Section^{54 of LandAcquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree dated 03-06-20'14^{made in O.P.NO.59of 2013 on the file of the} court of the Senior C rvil Judge,^{Wanaparthy District.} Between:

¶196

R. Sudhakar Reddy, S/o.Kista Reddy

...AppellanUClaimant

)t/

AND

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L.A.' Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll'} Pebbdir' Mahabubnagar District

¶202

... RespondenuRespondent

¶203

L.A.A.S. No^:3 94^{0F 2016:}

¶204

Appeal under Section^{54 of Land AcquisitionAct against the Judgment} and Decree daled^{23-04-2014 made in o.P.No.443 0f 20120n the file of the} court of the Senior Civil^{Judge, Wanaparthy District.} Between:

¶205

R.Hemavardhan Reddy,^{S/o.Narayanareddy}

¶206

...APPellanUC^{la ima nt}

¶207

AND

¶208

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbair' Mahabubnagar District

¶209

... RespondenuRespondent

¶210

L.A.A. S. No.398 OF^2016:

¶211

Appeal under Section 54^{of Land AcquisitionAct against the Judgment} and Decree dated^{20-03-2013made in o.P.NO.367 0t2012 0n the file of the} court of the Senior^{Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.} Between:

¶212

Golla Gounikadi Ashanna,^S/o.Buddanna

¶213

...AppellanUClaimant

¶214

AND

¶215

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigationScheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbdir' Mahabubnagar District' ... RespondengRespondent

¶216

¶217

L.A.A.S. No.483 oF^2016:

¶218

Appeal under^{Section54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment} and Decree^{dated23-04-20'14made in O P NO'421 ot 2012 on the file of the} court cf the^{Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'} Between:

¶219

M.srinivasulu,^{S/o.Krishnaiah}

¶220

...AppellanUC^laimanf

¶221

AND

¶222

The Special Depuly^{Collector, 1.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme'Phase - ll'} Pebbiir, Mahabubnagar^District

¶223

... RespondenURespondent

¶224

Counsel for the^{Appellant(s) in all L.A'A'S's:Ms'JahnaviPabba}

¶225

Counsel for the^{Respondentin all L.A.A'S's:GP for Appeals}

¶226

The Court delivered^{the following:COMMONJUDGMENT}

¶227

)

¶228

¶229

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶230

AND

¶231

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI

¶232

L.A.A.S.Nos. 175. 184- 1 49. 197. L9 8 227.23L.24 8 25L.269. 3t2,32s,343.347 , 35r,359,3 66,367,376. 393, 394, 398 and

¶233

483 of 2O16

¶234

COMMON JUDGMENT: (per Justice G. Sri Devi)

¶235

The lis in this batch of Appeals preferred by the claimants pertain to common acquisition proceedings and therefore, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.

¶236

2 Heard learned counsel for the claimants and Sri D.Kirarr, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent. / Perused the materia,l available on record.

¶237

The present acquisition was for the purpose of Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-II, Pebbair, which is ancillary project of Priyadarshini Joorala Project. This Court uide judgrnent, dated 15.09.2022 has already elaborately analysed the evidence and considered the identical issue raised in these appeals in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016. Both the counsel have not disputed the factum of commonality of the evidence and the issue in these

¶238

t I

¶239

)

¶240

appcals and in L..A.A.S.No.i ll- 2016, rrherein this Court has allorved the appc:rl cnhancilq the market value bv tu'o more times (1^I 2) tharr the valuc iixcd by the i..A.O. rvith all other consequential bencflts as stipulirtcd under the atnended Act

¶241

Therefore, follou,ing the jtrdgrnent passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016, dated 15.09.2022 and for the reasons stated therein, all these appcals stand allo.r,,ed by enhancing the marliet value of thc acquirccl land by two more times (i+2) than the value iixed by rhc L.A.O. ri ith all other consequential benefits as stipulated unde r thc amcnde rl Act. No order as to cos,,-s.

¶242

Miscellaneous petitions, il rrnv, sha1l stand closed.

¶243

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JotNr REGrsrrrR //TRUE COPY//

¶244

sEcIoN o4rcen

¶245

To,

¶246

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,(with records) (enclose the copy of Judgment L.A.A.S.No.4 of 20i6, dated lS'{,g-ZO22l

¶247

Two CCs to the GP for Appeals, High Court for the State of Telangana at HyderabadIOU!

¶248

One CC to Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate[OpUC]

¶249

Two C.D. Copies plp

krF

HIGH COURT

DATEO:221O912022

rH r4:
a' (rr
,
c-l
1g illB 2m :: 1'
l.\r
+ ;..:.:
:^ , r'.. rl' - j/

¶254

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶255

L.A.A.S. Nos:175 . 184.^{189. 197.198.227 .231.248.2s1.269.312.325. 343.} 347,351 . 359. 366 . 367.^{376 . 393,394.398AND 483 0F 2016}

¶256

DISPOSING OF THE ALL^L.A.A.S WTHOUT COSTS

¶257

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶258

AND

¶259

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYN)ARSINI

¶260

L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2OL6

¶261

COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Justice G. Sri Devi)

¶262

This appeal is preferred by the claimants seeking enhancernent of compensation awarded by the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet (hereinafter referred to as "the reference Court") in L.A.O.P.No.47 of 2012, dated. 19.03.2013. By the impugned order, the reference Court has awarded the market value for t]1e houses/ structures of the claimants one time more (1+ 1) than what was awarded by the Land Acquisition Ofhcer in Award No.34 of 2071, dated 1O. 11.2O11.

¶263

2- The houses and structures of the claimants situated in Anugonda Village, were acquired by the Government for the purpose of submergence under Priyadarshini Joorala Project, by issuing draft notification under Section a (f) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act") on 09 .O9.2OO9. After due enquiry, the Land Acquisition Oflicer has passed an award on lO.ll.2Orl fixing compensation for houses, structures and open places on the basis of prevailing rates as on the date of notilication re\ring upon the valuation frxed by the requisition authority, Irrigation Department. The clairnalts having received the compensation under protest, sought for reference to the civil Court under Section 18 of the Act, seeking

¶264

¶265

GSD,J&MGP,J l-aas 4 2016

¶266

enhancement of compensation By the impugned order, the reference Court has enhanced the markr:t value one time more (i+1) than what was awarded b1' the Land Acquisition Officer. Seeking further enhancement of compensatior.r, the claimants preferred the present appeal.

¶267

Heard the learned counscl for the appellants/claimants and Sri D.Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Appeals. Perused the material available on recorcl.

¶268

The main contention of the learned counsel for the <:laimants is that even under the Governmcnt Orders i.e., G.O.Ms.No.234, dated 15.10.1993, marked as Ex.A6, the Government has passed orders granting compensation 1 +2 times for the houses/ structures acquired in respect of Srisailam Project. It is submitted that inasmuch as the present acquisition of the houscs / structures of the claimants also for the purpose of irrigation project i.e., Priyadarshini Joorala Project, Ex.A6 is equally applies to the case of the claimants and therefore, the learned counsel seeks to cnhance the market value of the compensation 1+2 times than what was awarded by the L.A.O.

¶269

The Assistant Government Pleader for Appeals would submit that the G.O. covered by Ex.A6 u,as issued in respect of Srisailam project and whereas the present acquisition pertains to priyadarshini

¶270

¶271

GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016

¶272

Joorala Project, for^which no^{specific G.O. was issued by the} Government and therefore,^{Ex.A6cannot be taken into consideration.} He further submits that as seen^fromEx.A1 ,^{the referenceCourt,in} respect of earlier acquisition in O.P.No.611^{of 1999, hasenhanced the} market value by one trme^{morethan the value fixed by the L.A.O. As} seen from Ex.A2, this Court^{in A.S.No.3375 of 20OO hasconfirmedthe} market value hxed in Ex.Al.^{Even the Apex Court, as seenfrom} Ex.A3, has dismissed the appeal confirming the^{hxation of the said} market value by the reference^{Court.Therefore,the learnedAssistant} Government Pleader for Appeals,^{relying on Ex.A3, submitsthat the} market value fixed by the reference^{Court is basedon evidenceand} needs no interference by this Court.

¶273

A perusal of the record discloses that in^{respect of the earlier} acquisition proceedings^pertaining to^{GaddampallyH/o. Anugonda} Village, the reference Court has^{passed orders} in^{O.P.No.29of 2OO4} arrd Batch, dated 23.01.2OO6 enhancing^{the market value by one time} more than the value hxed by the L.A.O.^{The said order was marked as} Ex-A1O. Inasmuch as the^present acquisition^{proceedingsrelates to} the adjacent village covered^{by Ex.AlO, the reference Courtrelyingon} Ex.A1O has frxed the market^{valueby one timemorethanthe va-lue} fixed by the L.A.O. The record further^{discloses that the Government} has issued orders on^{15.10.1993, which was markedas Ex'A6,}

¶274

¶275

(;SD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016

¶276

ordering for enhancement of compensation two times nrore (1+2) than the value hxed b5, the L.A.O., in respect of the acquisition of structures that were acquire.d for the purpose of Srisailam project. Although the learned Assistanr Government pleader submits that this project is entirely different one and the sard G.O. covered by Ex.A6 which was issued for Srisailam project cannot be applied in the absence of any specific G.O. issucd for the prcscnt project, this Court is not inclined to accept the said contention for the reason that the present acquisition proceedings also pertains to Irrigation purpose. Even the other contention of the learned Assistant Government pleadcr that under Ex.A3, the Apex Court has confirmed the earlier fixation of market va-lue by reference Court by one more time (l+l) than the one lxed by the L.A.O. and therefore, the present enhancement made by the reference Court wl.rich is in tune with Ex.A3 cannot be disturbed is also unsustainable for the reason that Ex.A6 issued by the Government granting 1+2 has not been brought to the notice of the Apex Court.

¶277

It is relevant to refer clause (ii) of Ex.A6, which specihes that.the market ualue of the structures including Loell uhich has been treated. as structure bg tLe Lard Acquisition Off.cer in his au_tard.; and house sites shall be fixed at three times the ualue (1+2) d.etermined by the Land Acquisition offi.cers." Even though Ex,A6 pertarns to the acquisition

¶278

GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016

¶279

proceedings in respect of Srisailam Project, the beneht thereof cannot be denied to the present appellants on the mere ground tJlat the present proceedings pertainrng to a different project. After atl, both the acquisition proceedings are for the purpose of irrigation projects. Therefore, basing on Ex.A6, this Court is inclined to ".rhr.r". ih. market value by two more times than the value fixed by the L.A.O.

¶280

In the result, the appeal is allowed enhancing the market value by two more times (1+2) than the value hxed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶281

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶282

JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶283

JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSIM

¶284

75.O9.2022 gkv/tsr

¶285

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶286

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶287

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶288

L.A.A.S. No:'175 OF 2016

¶289

Between:

¶290

D.T.Balaraju, S/o.Satyanarayana

¶291

...AppellanUClaimant

¶292

AND

¶293

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶294

...RespondenURespondent

¶295

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree daled 22-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.309 of 2013 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶296

ORDER : This appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate for the Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the respondent

¶297

This court while following the^judgrnent in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶298

'1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶299

fhal the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1⁺²⁾ than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as strpulated under the amended Act,

¶300

That the claimant be and hereby is not enlitled^{to claim interest for thc} delay period of 7O2 days in^preferring the appeal^{as specificallyordered by} this Court while condoning the delay:^and

¶301

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶302

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOrNr REGtSTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

vi/ SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy, 2 Two C.D. Copies Y ad

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912O22

DECREE

LAAS.No175 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^WITHOUTCOSTS

¶312

d eg

¶313

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶314

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶315

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶316

L.A.A.S. No:184 OF 2016

¶317

Between:

¶318

D.Hanmanth, S/o.Subhan

¶319

...AppellanUClaim a nt

¶320

AND

¶321

The.Special Deputy Colle-ctor, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶322

...RespondenURespondent

¶323

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 20-03-2013 made in O.P.NO.41O of 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶324

ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi pabba, Advocate for the Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the respondent

¶325

This court while following the judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶326

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶327

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the

¶328

L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act:

¶329

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1012 days in preferrng the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶330

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶331

,TRUE COPY//

¶332

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR /

:l't,/

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶337

Two C.D. Copies

,)$r-

HIGH COURT

OArEg:2210912O22

DECREE

LAAS.No.184^{of 2016}

¶343

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^WITHOUTCOSTS

¶344

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶345

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶346

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI^DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶347

L.A.A.S. No:189 OF 2016

¶348

Between:

¶349

Golla Mekala Buka Srinu, S/o- Balaiah

¶350

...AppellanUClaimant

¶351

AND

¶352

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev^{Lift lrrigationScheme'Phase- ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶353

... RespondenURespondent

¶354

Appeal under Section 54 of Land^{AcquisitionAct againstthe Judgment and} Decree dated 23-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.436^{o'f 2012 on the file of the} court of the Senior Civil Judge,^{Wanaparthy District.}

¶355

ORDER : This appeat coming on^{for hearing, upon perusing the grounds} of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the^{LowerCourt andthe material papers} in OP and upon hearing the arguments^{Ms.Jahnavi Pabba,Advocate for the} Appellant and of the Government^{Pleaderfor Appealsfor the respondent}

¶356

This court while following the^judgment in^{L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016} dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated^{thereon,doth orderanddecreeas} follows:-

¶357

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed^of,

¶358

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶359

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 698 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶360

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶361

//TRUE COPY//

¶362

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGIStrAR / ./

¶363

sEcfloN #rrrcen

¶364

To,

¶365

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶366

Two C.D. Copies

4)v-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.189 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶373

¶374

¶375

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶376

THURSDAY, THE^{TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶377

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE^{JUSTICE G SRI DEVI} And THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICEM.G.PRIYADARSINI}

¶378

L.A.A.S. No:^{1970F 2016}

¶379

Between:

¶380

J.Balaiah, S/o.Pentaiah

¶381

...AppellanUClaimant

¶382

AND

¶383

The Special Deputy^{Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigationScheme' Phase - ll'} Pebbdir, Mahabubnagar^District.

¶384

... RespondenURespondent

¶385

Appeal under Section^{54 of Land AcquisitionAct against the Judgment and} Decreedated20.o3.2o,t3madeino.P.No.34Tof2ol2onthefileofthe court of the Senior^{Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District'}

¶386

ORDER : This^{appeal coming on for hearing,upon perusingthe grounds} of appeal, the^{Judgment and Decree of the LowerCourt and the material papers} in OP and upon^{hearing lhe argumentsMs'Jahnavi Pabba' Advocate for the} Appellant and^{of the Govemment Pleader for Appeals for the respondent}

¶387

This court while^{following the judgmentin L'A A S No 4 of 2016} dated¹ 5-09-20^{22 and for the reasonsstated thereon'dothorderanddecreeas} follows:-

¶388

1 That the appeal^{be and hereby is disposedof,}

¶389

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more timesil +2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶390

That the clairnant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1098 days rn preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶391

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶392

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISfRAR

//TRUE COPY//

"/ b SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Jr:dge, at Wanaparthy,

¶397

Two C.D. Copies

t$'

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.197 of²⁰¹⁶

DISPOSING L.A.A.S,^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶404

\ d.
a

¶405

IN THE HIGH COURT^FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶406

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶407

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And

¶408

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶409

L.A.A.S. No:198 OF 2016

¶410

Between:

¶411

Nakka China Sankharamma, W/o. Nakka Naganna

¶412

...AppellanUC laim ant

¶413

AND

¶414

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶415

...RespondenURespondent

¶416

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 21-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.12 of 2013 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶417

ORDER : This appeal coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material^papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate for the Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the respondent

¶418

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and tor the reasons stated thereon, doth order and^decreeas follows:-

¶419

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶420

That the market varue of the acquired rand be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶421

That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 682 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶422

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶423

//TRUE COPY//

¶424

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAo JOINT REGIST,(A R -/ sEcTloN &f.'".*

¶425

To,

¶426

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶427

Two C.D. Copies

N$x

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.198 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶434

(

¶435

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶436

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶437

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶438

L.A.A.S. No:227 OF 2016

¶439

Between:

¶440

D.Kistanna, S/o.Suban

¶441

...AppellanUClaimant

¶442

AND

¶443

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶444

...RespondenURespondent

¶445

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 20-03-2013 made in O.P.NO.405 of 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶446

ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate for the Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the respondent

¶447

This court while following the judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 20'16 dated 15-09-2022 and lor the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶448

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶449

That the market vaiue of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶450

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1099 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶451

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶452

sd/-K.sRtNtvASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// v/,/ SECTION OFFICER

¶453

To,

¶454

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶455

Two C.D. Copies

x$x

HIGH COURT

DATED;221O912022

DECREE

LA.AS.No.227 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT^COSTS

¶462

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶463

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶464

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And

¶465

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶466

L.A.A.S. No:23'l OF 2016

¶467

Between:

¶468

Yatagiri Anlaneyulu, S/o. Y. Kistanna

¶469

.AppellanUClaimant

¶470

AND

¶471

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶472

...RespondenURespondent

¶473

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and"' Decree dated 23-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.435 of 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶474

¶475

This court while following the ,udgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶476

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶477

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶478

That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 699 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶479

That there be no order as k) costs in this appeal

¶480

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTBAR //TRUE COPY// a/ //

¶481

SECTION OFFICER

¶482

To,

¶483

'1. The Senior Civil Jrdge, at Wanaparthy,

¶484

Two C.D. Copies

HIGH COURT

DArED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.231 ot 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT COSTS

¶491

Q"t,
-\ -X{F

¶492

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶493

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶494

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE^G SRI^DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶495

L.A.A.S. No:248 OF 2016

¶496

Between:

¶497

Yatagiri Balaswamy, S/o. Yatagiri Balaiah

¶498

...AppellanUClaimant

¶499

AND

¶500

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation^{Scheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶501

...RespondenURespondent

¶502

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against^{the Judgment and} Decree dated 20-03-2013 made in O.P.NO.345 of^{2012 on the file of the} court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶503

ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing, upon^{perusing the grounds} of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower^{Court and the material papers} in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi^{Pabba, Advocatefor the} Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals^{for the respondent}

¶504

This court while following the^judgment in^{L.A.A.S.No.4of 2016} dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon,^{doth order and decreeas} follows:-

¶505

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed^of,

¶506

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶507

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1099 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶508

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶509

//TRUE COPY//

¶510

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR ,/

¶511

'Ql/ SECTION OFFICER

¶512

To,

¶513

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶514

Two C.D. Copies

,,]

) I

HIGH COURT

DATEO:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.248 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT^COSTS

¶523

¶524

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶525

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶526

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI^DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶527

L.A.A.S. No:251 OF 2016

¶528

Between:

¶529

Kadire Masanna, S/o. Kistanna

¶530

...AppellanUClaimant

¶531

AND

¶532

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase^{- ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶533

...RespondenURespondent

¶534

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment^and Decree dated 20-03-2013 made in O.P.NO.361 o'f 2012 on the^file of^the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶535

ORDER : This appeal coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the^{material papers} in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate^{for the} Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the respondent

¶536

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and^{decree as} follows:-

¶537

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶538

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times('1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶539

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1098 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶540

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶541

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR

//TRUE GOPY'

w-c SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶546

Two C.D. Copies

A$Y

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.25'l of²⁰¹⁶

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶553

IN THE HIGH COURT^FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶554

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶555

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE^G SRI^DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶556

L.A.A.S. No:269 OF 2016

¶557

Between:

¶558

Balaswamy, S/o.Pentaiah

¶559

...AppellanUClaimant

¶560

AND

¶561

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation^{Scheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶562

...RespondenURespondent

¶563

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against^{the Judgmentand.} Decree dated 22-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.29 of 2013 on^{the file of the court} of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶564

ORDER : This appeal coming on^{for hearing,upon perusingthe grounds} of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court^{and the material papers} in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi^{Pabba, Advocatefor the} Appellant and of the Govemment Pleader for Appeals^for the^respondent

¶565

This court while following the^{judgmentin L,A.A.S.No.4of 20 16} dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon,^{dothorder and decree as} follows:-

¶566

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed^of,

¶567

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipUlated under the amended Act

¶568

That the claimant be and lrereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 706 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay. and

¶569

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶570

sd/-K.sRtNrvASA RAO JOrNT REGTSTFAR

//TRUE COPY//

&/ SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶575

Two C.D. Copies

t$r

)

HIGH COURT

DATEO:2210912022

OECREE

LAAS.No.269 of 2016

OISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT^COSTS

¶583

(q)\jl-ve
1'i'.rr
'{

¶584

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶585

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶586

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And

¶587

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶588

L.A.A.S. No:312 OF 2016

¶589

Between:

¶590

Pothupalli Yadaiah, S/o.Ramulu,

¶591

21 . Smt. Chandrakala, W/o.Ravinder Goud,

¶592

Rajeshwar Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy,

¶593

Ragotham Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy, 24, Raghotham Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy, 25. Narotham Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy, 26. Narotham Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy, 27. Rqeshwar Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy,

¶594

Narotham Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy, 29. Ragotham Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy,

¶595

Rajeshwar Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy, 31 . Narotham Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy,

¶596

Ragotham Reddy, S/o.Padrnanabha Reddy,

¶597

Raleshwar Reddy, S/o.Padmanabha Reddy, 34. Ravula Janardhan Reddy, S/o.Bucha Reddy, 35. Ravula Janardhan Reddy, S/o.Bucha Reddy, 36. Ravula Janardhan Reddy, S/o.Bucha Reddy,

¶598

Smt. Jyothi, W/o.Ravinder Goud,

¶599

R.Surendranath Reddy, S/o Kista Reddy

¶600

...Appellants/Claimant 9, 29, 35 to 50 &57

¶601

AND

¶602

The Special Deputy Collector (LA),, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-Tl Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶603

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶604

Ravula Narsimha Reddy, S/o.Kista Reddy

¶605

Regula Srinivasulu SR) Moulali

¶606

Smt. P.Shantamma, W/o.Ramulu

¶607

48.Shekar Goud S/o Bala Goud

¶608

Telugu Kothakota Boya Laxmi S/o Manyarn

¶609

Telugu Kothakota Boya Thirupathi S/e Manyam

¶610

Boya Bala Peeramma, W/o.Ramulu

¶611

Ravinder Goud, S/o.Balaiah Goud

¶612

P. Gandhi S/o Ramulu

¶613

P. Satyanarayana S/o Ramulu

¶614

Pothulapalli Pentaiah S/o Jambulaiah

¶615

Pothulapalli Ashok S/o Jambulaiah

¶616

Bal Reddy, S1o R.Venkat Reddy (died) per L. Rs. Claimants NO 15 to 17 and 61

¶617

R.Sunitha W/o Rajeshwar Reddy

¶618

R. Ashok Reddy S/o R.Bal Reddy

¶619

R.Aravind Reddy S/o R.Bal Reddy

¶620

k. Venkatamma W/o Kista Reddy

¶621

R.Sudhakar Reddy W/o Kista Reddy

¶622

R.Gopal Reddy W/o Kista Reddy

¶623

R.Vishnuvardhan Reddy W/o Kista Reddy

¶624

Telugu Kotha Ramulu S/o Chinna Naganna

¶625

66.Aloor Boya Bal Raju S/o Rarnulu

¶626

Vakiti Telugu Sukkamma W/o Karrenna

¶627

Boya Buggapalli Venkatamma S/o Bal Ram

¶628

Pothulapalli Uppari Raju S/o Bala Ram

¶629

Pothulapalli Ramulu S/o Hanumanth

¶630

71 . Bakka Laxmaiah S/o Hanumanth

¶631

72.Golla Ramulu Wo Yerra Balaiah

¶632

J.Bakkaiah S/o Pentaiah

¶633

Venkataiah S/o Pedda Balaiah

¶634

Pasulu Boya Ramulu, S/o Balaiah

¶635

Buggapalli Ravi, S/o Kondanna

¶636

77.Vr:1aya Laxmi Wo R.Prathap Reddy

¶637

TS.Chandra Shekhar Reddy S/o Bucha Reddy

¶638

Vijaya Laxmi W/o R.Prathap Reddy

¶639

S0.Chandra Shekhar Reddy S/o Bucha Reddy

¶640

Vijaya Laxmi W/o R.Prathap Reddy

¶641

Chandra Shekar Reddy S/o Bucha Reddy

¶642

Telugu Kotha Venkataiah S/o Savaraiah

¶643

P. Upperi Laxmi D/o.Ramulu

¶644

B.Padma Wo Bandenna

¶645

R.Savithrarnma. Wo R.Bal Reddy,

¶646

( R 2 to R43 are not necessary parties)

¶647

. .. Respondents

¶648

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment^and Decree dated 09-03-2015 made in O-P.NO.75 of 2014 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶649

ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material^papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi^Pabba, Advocate^{for the} Appellants and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the^{respondentNo.1}

¶650

This court while following the judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶651

'1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶652

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential beneflts as stipulated under the amended Act

¶653

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 56 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay. and

¶654

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶655

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JorNr REGTS/AR //TRUE COPY// ul/

¶656

SECTION OFFICER

¶657

To,

¶658

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶659

Two C.D. Copies

1{l--

HIGH COURT

oATED'.2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.312^{of 2016}

¶665

OISPOSING L.A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶666

¶667

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶668

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶669

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶670

L.A.A.S. No:325 OF 2016

¶671

Between:

¶672

Thokali Narayana, S/o.R.Ramulu

¶673

...AppellanUClaimant

¶674

AND

¶675

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, lvlahabubnagar District.

¶676

...RespondenURespondent

¶677

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 20-03-2013 made in O.P.NO.309 of 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶678

¶679

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 o'f 2016 dated^'15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶680

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶681

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶682

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 7421 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶683

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶684

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JotNr REGrs/frAR

,TRUE COPY//

/ SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶689

Two C.D. Copies

HIGH COURT

DAIED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.32S of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT^COSTS

¶696

*<br>

¶697

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶698

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶699

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G,PRIYADARSINI

¶700

L.A.A.S. No:343 OF 2016

¶701

Between:

¶702

Golla Balaiah, S/o.Buchanna

¶703

...AppellanUClaimant

¶704

AND

¶705

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶706

...RespondenURespondent

¶707

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 22-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.27 ot 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶708

¶709

This court while following the judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and tor the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows.-

¶710

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶711

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times('l+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶712

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 716 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶713

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶714

sd/-K.sRtNtvASA RAO JOINT REGISt'RAR //TRUE COPY// *l

¶715

SECTION OLTTICER

¶716

To,

¶717

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶718

Two C.D. Copies

4l{<-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.343 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶725

,\XJX

¶726

¶727

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶728

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY^{OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶729

. .PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE^G SRI^DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE^{M.G.PRIYADARSINI}

¶730

L.A.A.S. No:347 OF 2016

¶731

Between:

¶732

R.Hemavardhan Reddy, S/o.R.Narayanareddy

¶733

...AppellanUClaimant

¶734

AND

¶735

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift^{lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶736

...Respondent/Respondent

¶737

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition^{Act againstthe Judgment and} Decree dated 03-06-2014 made in O.P.NO.101 of^{2013 on the file of the} court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy^District.

¶738

ORDER: This appeal coming on for^{hearing,upon perusing the grounds} of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the^{LowerCourt and the material papers} in OP and upon hearing the arguments^{lVls.JahnaviPabba, Advocatefor the} Appellant and of the Government Pleader^{for Appealsfor the respondent}

¶739

This court while following the^judgment in^{L.A.A.S.No.4of 2016} dated 15-09-2022 and ior the reasons stated^{thereon, dothorderanddecree as} follows:-

¶740

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed^of,

¶741

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶742

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 677 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶743

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶744

sdi-K.sRrNlvASA RAO JOrNT REGTSTTkAR

¶745

//TRUE COPY// Y, SECTION OFFICER

¶746

To,

¶747

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶748

Two C.D. Copies

HIGH COURT

OATED:2210912O22

DECREE

LAAS.No.347 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶755

IN THE HIGH COURT^FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶756

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶757

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE^{G SRIDEVI} And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE^{M.G.PRIYADARSINI}

¶758

L.A.A.S. No:351 OF 2016

¶759

Between:

¶760

Pothulapally Uppari Janardhan,^S/o.Balaram

¶761

..AppellanUClaimant

¶762

AND

¶763

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A.,^{RajeevLift lrrigation Scheme,Phase- ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶764

...RespondenUResPondent

¶765

Appeal under Section 54 of Land^{Acquisition Act againstthe Judgmeni'arid} Decree dated 03-06-2014 made^{in O.P.N0.60 of 2013 on the file of the court} of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy^District.

¶766

ORDER : This appeal coming^{on for hearing, upon perusing the grounds} of appeal, the Judgment and^{Decreeof the LowerCourt and the material papers} in OP and upon hearing the arguments^{Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocatefor the} Appellant and of the Government^{Pleader for Appeals for the respondent}

¶767

This court while following^{the judgmentin L.A.A.S.No.4of 2016} dated 15-09-20 22 and'for the^{reasons stated thereon, dothorder and decree as} follows:-

¶768

That the appeal be and^{hereby is disposedof,}

¶769

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(l+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with alt other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶770

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 681 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶771

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶772

//TRUE COPY//

¶773

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAo JOrNT REGtsr(A R ,/ (-' SECTION OFFICER

¶774

To,

¶775

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶776

Two C.D. Copies

HIGH COURT

DAf EO:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.351^{of 2016}

¶783

DISPOSING^{L.A.A.S. WITHOUTCOSTS}

¶784

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶785

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶786

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI . And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶787

L.A.A.S. No:359 OF 2016

¶788

Between:

¶789

Thota Mahendra, S/o.Balaiah

¶790

...AppellanUClaimant

¶791

AND

¶792

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶793

. ..Res pon de nURespo n den t

¶794

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 22-02-2013 made in O.P.NO.277 of 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶795

¶796

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and tor the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶797

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶798

That the market value^{of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by} hvo more times(1+2) than^{the value fixed by the L.A.O,with all other} consequential benefits as stipulated^{underthe amendedAct}

¶799

That the claimaht^{be and herebyis not entitledto claim interest for the} delay period of 1'191 days^{in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered} by this Court while condoning^{the delay: and}

¶800

That there be^no order^{as to costs in this appeal}

¶801

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JolNr REGISTTiZAR

/iTRUE COPY//

t./ sEcTroN drrtcen

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at^Wanaparthy,

¶806

Two C.D. Copies

h'rx-

HIGH COURT

DAIED:221O912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.359 of 2016

DISPOSING L,A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶813

¶814

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶815

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶816

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI^DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶817

L.A.A.S. No:366 OF 2016

¶818

Between:

¶819

Ganigadi Golla Balaiah, S/o.Buddaiah

¶820

...AppellanUC la imant

¶821

AND

¶822

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase^{- ll,} Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶823

... Res^po nde n URes^po n d ent

¶824

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 21-02-2013 made in O.P.NO.151 of 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶825

¶826

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No 4 of²⁰¹⁶ dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree^as follows:-

¶827

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶828

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced^by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O,^with all other .consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended^Act

¶829

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim^interest for the delay period of 1126 days in^preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶830

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶831

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTB,AR

,TRUE COPY//

E SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶836

Two C.D. Copies

HIGH COURT

DAf ED:22109t2022

DECREE

LAAS.No.366 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S, WITHOUT COSTS

¶843

)v, \NX

¶844

^ \

¶845

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶846

THURSDAY,^{THE TWENTYSECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO

¶847

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And

¶848

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI}

¶849

L.A.A.S. No:367 OF 2016

¶850

Between:

¶851

Ganigadi^{Golla Pentanna S/o.Buchanna}

...AppellanUClaimant

AND

The Special^{Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lnigationScheme, Phase - ll,} Pebbair,^{Mahabubnagar District.}

¶856

...RespondenURespondent

¶857

Appeal^{under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act againstthe Judgment and} Decree^{dated21-02-2013 made in O.P.NO.145of 2012 on the file of the} court of the^{Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.}

¶858

ORDER^{: This appeal coming on for hearing,uponperusingthe grounds} of appeal, the^{Judgment and Decreeof the LowerCourt and the material papers} in OP and upon^{hearingthe arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocatefor the} Appellant and^{of the Government Pleader for Appealsfor the respondent}

¶859

This court while following the^{judgmentin L.A.A.S.No.4of 2016} dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated^{thereon, dothorder and decree as} follows:-

¶860

That the appeal^{be and hereby is disposedof,}

¶861

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times( r+2) than the varue fixed by the L.A.o, with alr other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶862

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periorl of 1'106 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶863

That there be no order as lo costs in this appeal

¶864

//TRUE COPY//

¶865

sd/-K.sRtNtvASA BAO JOINT REGISTRAR Q/

¶866

SECTION OFFICER

¶867

To,

¶868

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶869

Two C.D. Copies

ts'

HIGH COURT

DATEO:22lOgl2O22

DECREE

LAAS.No.367 ot²⁰¹⁶

DISPOSING L.A,A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶876

li , I I t

¶877

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶878

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶879

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTIGE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTIGE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶880

L.A.A.S. No:376 OF 2016

¶881

Between:

¶882

J.G.Buchanna, S/o.Pedda Golla Bandalaiah

¶883

...AppellanUClaimant

¶884

AND

¶885

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase^{- ll,} Pebbair, Ivlahabubnagar District-

¶886

...RespondenURespondent

¶887

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment^and Decree dated 21-02-2013 made in O.P.NO.178 of 2012 on the^file of^the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶888

¶889

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of²⁰¹⁶ dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order^{and decreeas} follows:-

¶890

'1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶891

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶892

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1137 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶893

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶894

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGIST

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION O ICER

To,

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶899

Two C.D. Copies

¶900

1.\r(--

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.376 of²⁰¹⁶

DISPOSING L.A.A.S.^{WITHOUT COSTS}

¶907

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶908

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶909

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶910

L.A.A.S. No:393 OF 2016

¶911

Between:

¶912

R.Sudhakar Reddy, S/o.Kista Reddy

¶913

...AppellanUClaimant

¶914

AND

¶915

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase -^ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶916

...RespondenURespondent

¶917

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act againsl the Judgment and Decree dated 03-06-2014 made in O.P.NO.59 of 2013 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶918

ORDER:This appeal coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material^papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate for the Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the respondent

¶919

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of^{20 16} dated 15-09-2022 and lor the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree^as follows:-

¶920

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶921

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1 +2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶922

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 731 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶923

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶924

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JorNT REGTSTRAR /-/ //TRUE COPY// L/ SECTION OFFICER

¶925

To,

¶926

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶927

Two C.D. Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912Q22

DECREE

LAAS.No.393 of 2016

OISPOSING L.A.A,S. WITHOUT COSTS

¶934

(q)
,>'t-:
' 1'\t

¶935

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶936

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶937

' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶938

L.A.A.S. No:394 OF 2016

¶939

Between:

¶940

R.Hemavardhan Reddy, S/o.Narayanareddy

¶941

...AppellanUClaimant

¶942

AND

¶943

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶944

...RespondenURespondent

¶945

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgmen( and Decree dated 23-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.443 ol 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶946

ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate for the Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the respondent

¶947

This court while following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶948

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶949

That the market valLre of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more tim€rs(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequentral benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶950

That the cla mant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 773 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay: and

¶951

That there bc no order as to costs in this appeal

¶952

,TRUE COPY//

¶953

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOrNr REGTsfAR -,/ (' SECTION OFFICER

¶954

To,

¶955

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy,

¶956

Two C.D. Copies

Nt-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.394 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT COSTS

¶963

IN THE HIGH COURT^FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶964

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY^{OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶965

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶966

L.A.A.S. No:398 OF 2016

¶967

Between:

¶968

Golla Gounikadi Ashanna, S/o.Buddanna

¶969

...AppellanUGlaimant

¶970

AND

¶971

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase^- ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶972

...RespondenURespondent

¶973

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 20-03-2013 made in O.P.NO.367 o'f 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶974

¶975

This court whrle following the^judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated^'15-09-2022 and for the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree^as follows:-

¶976

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶977

That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more tinres('1+2) than the value fixed by the l_.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶978

That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1107 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Courl while condoning the delay: and

¶979

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶980

,TRUE GOPY//

¶981

sd/-K.sRrNrvASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR ./ ,/

¶982

LL, SECTION OFFICER

¶983

To,

¶984

The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanapa(hy,

¶985

2.TwoCD Copies

{$}

HIGH COURT

DAf ED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.398 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT COSTS

¶992

Z-\ (.\ x,x-)

¶993

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶994

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶995

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI And THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶996

L.A.A.S. No:483 OF 2016

¶997

Between:

¶998

M.Srinivasulu, S/o.Krishnaiah

¶999

...AppellanUClaimant

¶1000

AND

¶1001

The Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, Mahabubnagar District.

¶1002

,.,RespondenURespondent

¶1003

Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 23-04-2014 made in O.P.NO.421 of 2012 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy District.

¶1004

ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in OP and upon hearing the arguments Ms.Jahnavi Pabba, Advocate for the Appellant and of the Government Pleader for Appeals for the responitent

¶1005

This court while following the judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 dated 15-09-2022 and tor the reasons stated thereon, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶1006

That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of,

¶1007

That the mamet value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced by two more times(1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O, with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act

¶1008

That the clar.nant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 699 days rn preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court urhile condoning the delay: and

¶1009

That there be no order as to costs in this appeal

¶1010

Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOrNT REGTSytAR

¶1011

,TRUE COPY//

¶1012

l/ /' -v SECTION OFFICER

¶1013

To,

¶1014

The Senior Civil .rudge, at Wanaparthy,

¶1015

Two C.D. Copies

*\ir

HIGH COURT

DAIED:2210912022

DECREE

LAAS.No.483 of 2016

DISPOSING L.A.A.S. WITHOUT COSTS

¶1022

1^;1.> \rrx

Nakka Shankaramma v. The Special Deputy Collector (La)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nakka Shankaramma v. The Special Deputy Collector (La)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Land Acquisition Officer, Adilabad Dist. Vs Tallapalli Linga Rao and 37 Others

G.Vinod Kumar Reddy, Rr Dist Vs G.Suhasini, Hyd

The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Vs G.Jeeveshwar

Buggapally Sayamma Vs The Special Deputy Collector and 39 Others

Pothupalli Yadaiah, Vs The Special Deputy Collector (La)

J.Balaiah Vs The Special Deputy Collector (La)