The High Court dismissed an Income Tax Tribunal appeal on withdrawal by the appellant, citing coverage under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. Pending interlocutory applications stand closed without costs.
DTA dismissed on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
IUONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 43 OF 2016
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'B' Hyderabad in lTA.No.712lHydl2o14 for assessmentyear 2003-04 daled 12.11.2014 preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) ll Hyderabad, lTA.No.0273 to 0276/ClT (A)-ll, Hyd/2012-13 dated 17.01.2014, preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 4, PAN/GlR No.AABCC34SSA dated 27 .O2.2006.
Between:
The Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax-l, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Conexant Systems lndia Pvt. Ltd., D-3, Mariner Block, Vanenburg lT Park, Madhapur, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA(SC FOR l.T. DEPT) Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI CH. PUSHYAM KIRAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE ION'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHL'}I,\I AND THE H( N'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
|TTA.NO.43 0F 2016
(
Heard [t/r. B Narasimha Sarma learned Standing Counsel for lncome
Tax Department for the appellant and Mr. Ch.Pushyanr Kirarr lr:arned counsel for the respondent.
Mr. B.Naras'nha Sarma, learned Standing Counse submits on the basis of written in: tructions dated 07.06.2022 that the aptx-.al filed by the Revenue is require, I to be withdrawn as the issue is covere,l under Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme.
That being tl e position, the related appeal is dismisse: on withdrawal
lnterlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand,:losed. No order
as to costs
\
SD/. tVI.]S ANTHI VARDHANI iolNTREqIS.TRAR ,TRUE COPY// \ -{ t \ '-'lL'{\t)-r- !iECTION OFFICER
To,
.}/-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 13106,2022
.__ s.rArE
I.
,/i
/'."
7.
lt ::
r T N0'i 2$Il +-\c
\ir\i.:
),, g{ (t
'---i-fi:i {
ORDER
ITTA.No.43 ol'2016
DISMISSING I HE ITTA AS WITHDRA\ VN WITHOUT COIiTS
@
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Hyderabad
M/s. Conexant Systems India Pvt. Ltd.
UJJAL BHUYAN
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
