Dismissed

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-7, Hyd v. M/S. Deccan Grameena Bank, Hyd

Telangana HC8 Sept 2022ITTA/351/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana, in a common judgment, dismissed six income-tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that appeals should be dismissed on the submission of the appellant that they were withdrawing in view of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, without awarding any costs.

What did the court decide?

The appeals are dismissed on withdrawal. No costs are awarded against the respondents.

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-7, Hyd… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

i I :

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABD

¶4

THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶7

|.T.T.A.Nos.351 & 602 of 2016 300 564 586 ol 2017 25O ot 2018 and 339 of 2019

¶8

ITTA.No.351 of 2016

¶9

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tdbunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.857l{ydl2005 for assessment Year 2007-2008 dated 12.02.2016 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vll, Hyderabad, ITA No.0143/DCIT 9 (1yClT (A)-Vll/2013-14 dated 29.04.2015 preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-9 (1), Hyderabad PAN/GIR No.AAAAD3893M dated 10.O1.2014. Between:

¶10

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7, lT Towers, A.C. Guards, Masabtank, Hyderabad.

¶11

.,.APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

M/s. Deccan Grameena Bank,9-2711 , First Floor, Lalitha Nagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad-500060. (PAN No. AAAAD3893M)

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

ITTA.No.602 of 2016

¶16

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.1742lHydl2014 for assessment Year 20'10-2011 dated 25.03.2015 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vl, Hyderabad, Appeal No.009212O13-141 CIT (A)-Vl dated 29.08.2014 preferred against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer Ward-9 (4), Hyderabad PAN/G lR No.AAAAD3893M dated 25.O3.2O I 3.

¶17

-.\

¶18

Between:

¶19

The Principal C orrmissioner of lncome Tax-7, Hyderabad.

¶20

...APPEI.L.ANT/PETITION ER

¶21

AND

¶22

Deccan Grame :na Bank, 9-27 1 1, 1 st Floor, Lalitha Nagar D)ilsukhnagar, Hyderabad

¶23

.,.RESPONDENT

¶24

ITTA.No.300 ol 2017

¶25

lncome Tax T ibr.rnal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the ordr r of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, l'ly'derabad Bench^'A' Hyderabad in ITA \o.936lHydl2o15 for assessment Year 2O11-2012 dated 03.08.2016 preferrec against lhe Order of the Commissiorer of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vll, Hyder rb,ad, ITA No.0144/DCIT I (1yClT rl,)/Vlli2013-14 dated 29.O4.2015 preferred lgainst the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 9 (1), Hyderabz I PAN/GIR No.AAAAD3893M dated 30.01 .i1014.

¶26

Between:

¶27

Prinicipal Con rissioner Of lncome Tax-7, 3rd Floor. A-Block, l.T.Towers, A.C.Guards, M rs.abtank, Hyderabad-4

¶28

,..APPELLANT

¶29

AND

¶30

fVl/s. Deccan G arneena Bank, (Presently Known as Telarrgana Grameena Bank)9-2711, I irst Floor, Lalitha Nagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hydr::rabad. (PAN No. AAAAD3893M

¶31

...RESPONDENT

¶32

lTTA.No.564 of 2017

¶33

Income Tax T ibunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, '196'1 against the ordt r r>f the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, l.lyderabad Bench 'B' Hyderabad in ITA \cr.134lHydl2o14 for assessment Yea' 2009-2010 dated 18.01 .2017 preferred aggainst the Order of the Additional Cornmissioner of Income Tax (Transfer Pricir g), 6th floor, B Block, lT Towers, l-ly(jerabad, in PAN No.AAACW2655C dzteri 28.01.2013 preferred against the C)rder of the Deputy

¶34

¶35

Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1 ( 1), Hyderabad PAN/GIR No.AAACW2655C dated 03.12.20'13.

¶36

Between:

¶37

The Principal Commissioner Of lncome Tax -1, Hyderabad

¶38

...APPELLANT

¶39

AND

¶40

M/s. ADP P\i(. Ltd.,6-3-1091/C/1 , Fortune-9, Raj Bhavan Road, HYDERABAD.50OOs2.

¶41

...RESPONDENT

¶42

ITTA.No.586 of 2017

¶43

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench^'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.453lHydl2O14 for assessment Year 2009-2010 dated 19.10.2016 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax (Transfer Pricing), 6th floor, B Block, lT Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad, in PAN No.AAACF2723N dated 28.0'1.2013 preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1 (2), Hyderabad PANiGIR No. AAACF2723N dated 21.01 .2O14.

¶44

Between:

¶45

The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax- l, Hyderabad

...APPELLANT

AND

M/s. Conextant Systems Private Limited, 5th Floor, Pioneer Towers, Plot.No. 16, Survey No. 64/2, Software Units Layout, Madhapur, HYDERABAD500081

¶50

...RESPONDENT

¶51

|TTA.No.25O ol 2018

¶52

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITA No.792lHydl2016 for assessment Year 2010-201 1 dated 27.10.2017 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax

¶53

__ L_N,-

¶54

(Appeals)-1, Hyderab, rd, Appeal No.0134/ClT (A)-llHyd/2O13^'14, 2015-16 dated 17.02.2016 preferred rgainst the Order of the Deputy Commiss oner of lncome Tax, Circle 1 (2), Hyderaba I PAN/GIR No.AACCG1654P dated 28.03.2013

¶55

Between:

¶56

The Principal C ommissioner of lncome Tax-I, HYDERABT\D

¶57

...APPELLANT

¶58

AND

¶59

firl/s. Celon Lak cratories Pvt. Ltd, Flat no.102, Shriyas Elergance, 3-6-643, street no.9, Hir rayathnagar, HYDERABAD-500029

¶60

...RESPONDENT

¶61

ITTA.No.339 of 2019

¶62

lncome Tax T-ibunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of ihe lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the ord ;r of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal {yderabad Bench^'A' Hyderabad in ITA \o.17751{yd12017 for assessment Year 2008-2009 dated 31 .01 .2019 preferre, against the Order of the Commissic,ner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-ll, Hyderalrad, Appeal No.0544/DCITCC-1(3)/ClT (A)-ll/Hyd109-10113-14 dated 10.08.2017 p eferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Cent al Circle 6, Hyderabad dated 31 ..111.2009 in PAN/GIR No.AGOPB2894M.

¶63

Betwee n:

¶64

The Principal )ommissioner of lncome-Tax, (Central) Hyderabad.

¶65

...APPELLANT

¶66

AND

¶67

Shri Bujunuri ogi Reddy, 2-2-115O11, Tilak Nagar, Hyder:rbad. ...RESPONDENT

¶68

Counsel for the Ap rellant in all Appeals: SRI AJAY KUMAFI KULAKARNI, REPRESENTING FOR SRI B. NT.RASIMHA SARMA SC FOR I.T. DEPARTMENT

¶69

Counsel for the Re ;pondent in ail Appeals: SRI A. V. A. Sl\rA KARTIKEYA

¶70

The Court made th,,following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶71

ON'BLE T rIIEF STICE U AND

¶72

THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

¶73

6,1 & 58 f t7 0 of 2018

¶74

and 339 of 2019

¶75

COMMON JUDGMENT :^(Per Ae t lor'bte rt,t Chiei Iu tie^{I tlit/} Btulu)

¶76

I{eard Mr. Aiay I(umar I(ulkarni, lcatned counsel representing Mr. B.Narsimha Sarma, lcarned Standing Counsel lor the appellant-Income^-I'ax Department and Mr. A.V.A.Siva I(artikeya, learned counscl for thc respondcnts

¶77

Learncd counscl [r-lr the appcllant submits that in view of settlement under the Dircct f tx Vivad Sc Vishwas Scheme, 2020,

¶78

appellant wants to withdraw thc present appeals.

¶79

In view of above, thc appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

¶80

No costs.

¶81

¶82

SD/-K.SRINIV RAO JOIN RAR

¶83

i /TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER

¶84

To, 1. The lncome^{Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A" Hvderabad'} 2. i# iffi;; i;;^{AEF;i6"1r,i6;;;i:HiJ""uiJ Bench'B''Hvderabad'} 3. iii; b;;;1";i";"ibr^{lnco.e rax (Apbeals)-Vll, Hvderabad'} 4. +# #;i; c;;mlssioner^{of lnComd tax, circle 9 (1)'Hvderabad'} 5. ih; tn;'o;'" iix officer,^{ward-9(4), Hvderabad} b. The Additional^{commissioner oi r#ti'L ili(Tr"nsferPricing)'6'n Floor'} B Block,^{lT Towers, Hyderabad-4'}

¶85

1. in?"o?'ct.-.iisidne'r^{ot lncome Tax, circle -1 (1)' Hvderabad} 6. +il: ;l ;#;i;iioner ot^{tncome tax, circle-1 (2), Hvderabad'} 9.10 ine ci;;Ei'i;'$-d cirmmissioner -trtarasimna^{of lncome Tax} sarmi,^{(Appeals)-ll'} S c for lr^HyderaDa-o. Dept IoPUCI 11 5# 6d i;5;i^{A V A. Siva Kartikeva, Advocate[oPUC]} 12. Two CD^Copies 13. One SPare^CoPY gbr

)

HIGH COURT

DATED: 08/0912022

tl 2 lrrl'J 2!?2

COMMON JU DGMENT

lTTA.Nos.3s1 & 602 of 2016 300 564 586 a't 2017 250 ot 2018;gtrd_339_r f 2019

¶92

¶93

DISMISSING THE ALL APPEALS AS WITHDRI,WN WITHOUT C()STS

¶94

,w1 to

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-7, Hyd v. M/S. Deccan Grameena Bank, Hyd

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-7, Hyd v. M/S. Deccan Grameena Bank, Hyd

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Vst Industries Ltd. Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad

Comm.of Income Tax,Ap -I,Hyderabad Vs M/S.Lakshmi Builiders,Hyd

The District Collector, Hyderabad and 2 Others Vs M/S. Kishan Chand Foundation Trust, Hyderabad.

The Prl Commr of Income Tax - 7, Hyderabad Vs Deccan Grameena Bank, Hyderabad

M/s. Sunrise Homes Limited, Vs The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd Vs M/S Adp Pvt. Ltd., Hyd