Allowed

M/S. Rama Spinners Pvt. Limited v. the Income Tax Officer

Telangana HC28 Oct 2022ITTA/213/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Income Tax Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act was allowed to be withdrawn by the appellant. Counsel stated the dispute was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Virodah Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on withdrawal without any order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act was dismissed on withdrawal.

M/S. Rama Spinners Pvt. Limited Vs the Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY ,THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶4

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 213 OF 2010

¶5

Appeal Under Section 260A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 04-04-2008 in l.T.A. No. 557 / Hyd/05 ( Asst. Year 1998-1999) on the file of the Court of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "A" Hyderabad preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals ) -lll, Hyderabad dated '11-04-2005 in ITA No. 131 i JCIT SR-6 / CIT (A) lll / 02-03 preferred against the order of the Joint Commissioner of lncome tax ( Assts ) Special Range 6, Hyderabad dated 16-02-20001 in PAN / GIR No. R- 123.

¶6

Between:

¶7

M/S. Rama Spinners Pvt. Limited, Represented by its Managing Director Mr.Gopal Agarwal 2-1-113, Tobacco Bazar, Secunderabad. ...APPELLANT AND

¶8

The lncome Tax Officer, Ward 2 (2), Ayakar Bhawan, Hyderabad

¶9

...RESPONDENT

¶10

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2010(ITTAMP. NO: 56 OF 2010)

¶11

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 04.04,2008 passed by the Hon'ble lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A", in ITA No.557/Hyd/2005 for the Assessment Year 1998-99

¶12

Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. Sravani for Sri Chlla Gunaranjan

¶13

Counsel for the Respondent: Ms. Sapna Reddy

¶14

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶15

¶16

lE!^{HON'BLE THE} CE U.IJAI ]TIryAN

¶17

AND TII ) IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHAIJKAII TI]'DI)Y

¶18

I.T.T.A.No.2 13 of 2O 1,0

¶19

JUDGME]Y li lPer the I roi'ble ttrc Chtef Jltstice Ujjat Bhtryahl

¶20

Hezu I Ms. Sravani, learned counsel fo: the appellant and Ms. lj tpna Reddy, learned counsel for the r,:sFondent.

¶21

Lezrr red counsel for the appellant st-rb rl ts that the erppe ant ras settled the tax dispute in l-erms r:f the Direct Tax Vivacl Se Visl-ru,as Schenre. Therefore, aptr€llant would hl<e to rvitl draw this appeal.

¶22

ln \ re\, of above, the appeal is iismi'rsed on lvith d rau,a

¶23

Misc llaneous applications pencling, il any, shall stancl clos d. Ho"vever, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶24

Iit )/.B.S.CHIRANJEEVI .IOINT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

| . 1L')

S,ECTION OFFICER

1 The Income 1 ax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench A, l'{yd':rabad 2 The Commis: oner of lncome Tax ( Appeals ) - lll, Hyder:;bad. 3 The Joint Co nmissioner of lncome Tax (Assts), Special R rnge-6, Hyderabad. 4. One CC to Sr Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate (O,PUC) 5 One CC to fV ;. Sapna Reddy Advocate [OPUC] r) Two CD Copi ,s

¶30

One Spare Cr py Kul gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED:28110 2022

-1r\f
,/ !.<br>li
1,, . 21 i:Et ?[Il
<br>

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

lTTA.No.213 rf 2010

¶37

I)IS\lISSI(; IHI: I' t,\ ON WITHDRAWL.

¶38

@i*' %>6-,.P

M/S. Rama Spinners Pvt. Limited v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Rama Spinners Pvt. Limited v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Nagarjuna Degree College and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Kolisetty Shiva Kumar Vs The Election Commission of India and 3 Others

Medarametla Lasya Vs Union of India

G.Chandraiah Vs The Registrar

M/S. Keerthi Industries Ltd., Hyderabad. Vs the Government of a.P., Iandc, Secretariat, Hyd, and 2 Others

M/s. Progressive Constructions Company, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh