Judgment dated 28 March 2022 in Civil Revision Petition No. 685 of 2019. The High Court of Telangana dismissed the petition as infructuous after recording submission that the underlying matter was settled out of court.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous; costs to be borne by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF IVARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A,VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 685 OF 2019
Between:
K.Neeraja @ Rajani, Wo K.Narasinga Rao, Aged about 43years, Occ. Housewife, presently at 2-1-20512, Plot No.30, Road No.3, Venkataramana Colony, Nagole, Ranga Reddy District
...Petitioner/ RespondenUDHr
AND
K.Narsinga Rao, S/o late Jagannadham, Aged about 56years, Occ. Govt. Service, Commercial Tax Officer O/o CTO, 4th floor, Kakatiya Building, Abids Circle, Nampally Station Road Hyderabad-500001
...RespondenU Petitioner/JDr
Petition under Article 227 o'f ihe Constitution of lndia,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may bepleased to set aside order dt.05.03.2019passed in EA.No.1412019 in EP.No.1312018 by The Judge, Additional Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in so far as it directs adducing of evidence by JDr regarding means are concerned and consequently pass orders direqing the out of Additional Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad to dispose of EP.No.'13120'1 B forthwith.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend operation of order dt.05.03.2019passed in EA.No.1412019 in EP.No.13/2018 by The Judge, Additional Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
For the Petitioner: Sri J. Prabhakar, Advocate
Forthe Respondent: Sri B. Sree Rama Krishna, Advocate
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CML REVISION PETITION No.6 8s oF 2019
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel on behalf ol the petitioner, who seeks to submit that the matter is settled out of Court and no cause survives. Accordingly, while recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this CRp is dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances of the case, the parties shall bear their respective costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, in this CRp, shall stand closed.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 The J^u^dge,_Additional Family Court, City Civit Court, Hyderabad 9ne QQto Sri J. Prabhakar, Advocate IOPUCI 3 One CC to Sri B. Sree Rama Krishna, Advocaie tOpUCl 4 Two CD Copies 5 One Spare Copy
KNK IVMA {
) )
HIGH COURT
DATED:2810312022
ORDER
CRP.No.685 of 2A19
1i,{E s14
c..
/
.r'-.,IZ
2 duti iu
r)
\ * .:5 .,/
o;Spa-iCrtf.c rl
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
K. Neeraja @ Rajani
K. Narsinga Rao
A. Venkateswara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
