Dismissed

Sanaila Muralidhar, Nalgonda Dist v. Ravula Achaiah, Nalgonda Dist and 10 Others

Telangana HC23 Mar 2022CRP/6435/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 without representation on behalf of the petitioner. The court observed no merits to adjourn due to the delay arising from the original suit filed in 2007.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition No. 6435 of 2016 was dismissed for default/non-prosecution.

Sanaila Muralidhar, Nalgonda Dist Vs Ravula… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF IVIARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA^REDDY

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PE TITION NO:^{6435 0F 2016}

¶6

Petition under Article 227 of lhe^{constitutionof lndia, aggrieved by the order} dated 30.08.2016^passed in^{l.A.No.44 of 2016 in o.s.No.7 of 2007 on the file of the} Court of Senior Civil Judge at^Suryapet

¶7

Between:

¶8

SANAILA MURALIDHAR'^{S/o Veeresham,Aged about 61 years'occ:} Retd.Govt. Employee^{R/o Suryapet, Nalgonda District}

¶9

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF

¶10

AND

¶11

l.RavulaAchaiah,s/oRamaiah,Agedab-out66yearsocc:AqricultureFl/o Near Bura Biksham^{dX;'ffiiii;;i;i"bioii n6"o Suryapet'Nargonda} District.

¶12

NO'1 ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/DEFENDANT

¶13

Ravula^{Rangaiah, S/o Kotaiah (died)}

¶14

Ravula^{Anthaiah' S/o Kotaiah}

¶15

Manthri^{Anthamma'W/o Ramulu}

¶16

Saragandia^{Yellamma'W/o Ramulu}

¶17

Ravula^{Nagaraiu' S/o Rangaiah}

¶18

Pittala^{Mangamma'W/o Lingaiah}

¶19

B. Ramula^{Ramulu' S/o Rangaiah}

¶20

Ravula^{Kotaiah' S/o Kotaiah}

¶21

Maripeddi^{Kotamma' W/o Lakshmaiah}

¶22

'1 1 . Poleboina^{Renuka' W/o NageshwarRao}

¶23

(fl r;:ft^{:f i?ffi :)*x"llfffi:ilfsrft!",'8iEE'$'f s)""*oo"'}

¶24

CRPMP. NO: 8429 OF 2016

¶25

Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therwith, the High Court may be pleased to STAY of all further proceedings in OS No.7 ol 2007 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, at Suryapet, pending disposal of the above CRP.

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. ASHVINI KUMAR

¶27

Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

1 \

¶30

) )

¶31

1 HON'B SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY

¶32

CIVIL REVISION PETITIO N No.6 435 0F 2016

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

This civil revision petition is filed assailing the order dated 30.08.2016 in I.A.No.44 of 2076 in O.S.No.7 of 2OO7 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Suryapet.

¶35

The plaintiff filed the application in LA.No.44 of 2016 was_ filed under Order XVI Rules 1, 6 and 7 r/w Section 151 C.P.C., to issue summons to Tahsildar, Suryapet, to produce the original pattadar passbook issuing register of^the Pillalamarri Revenue^{Village pertainingto pattadarpassbook} No.713549 vide^{patta No.707 and pattadarpassbook issuing} register of the^{Pillalamarri RevenueVillagepertaining to} pattadar passbook^{No'806905 videpattaNo 1109 belongingto} defendant^{No.1 and his wile Smt'Kamalammaand to mark} the entries^{as exhibitsThe Court below' after careful analysis} of the^{facts, dismissed the said application' Aggrievedby the} same,^{the plaintiffhas preferredthis civii revision petition'}

¶36

As per the^{proceedingsdated O7'04'2O17'though} petitioner^{was permitted to take out personal noticeto the} -_-*

¶37

)

¶38

¶39

respondents including on the counsel for the respondents before the trial Court and also notice by registered post with acknowledgement due, no such report is liled by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Moreover, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶40

In view of the fact that the matter is arising out of the original suit relating to the year 2OO7 and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, I find no merits to adjourn the matter.

¶41

Accordingiy, the civil revision petition is dismissed lor default/non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.

¶42

¶43

ASSISTAN??Sfl+Hi* //TRUE COPYII To, ,4#SECTION OFFICER 1 The Senior Civil Judge at S pet, Nargodna District. 2 one cc to sri J. Ashvini Ku 2 rmar, Advocate lopucl Two cD copies 4. c.lne Spare bopy gbr 1$\r

To,

HIGH COURT

DATED:^2310312022

ORDER

CRP.No.6435^{of 2016}

¶49

IHE SI4 r.s
c 14 JUN ?82?

PAt'

¶50

DISMISSING THE CRP FOR NON PROSECUTION

Sanaila Muralidhar, Nalgonda Dist v. Ravula Achaiah, Nalgonda Dist and 10 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanaila Muralidhar, Nalgonda Dist v. Ravula Achaiah, Nalgonda Dist and 10 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.G.Kumari and another Vs E.Manjula Reddy

State Bank of India Vs The Register

Smt. Ediga Kashimamma Vs Ediga Anjaneylu Goud

P B Srinivasan, Karimnagar Dist Vs Syed Abdul Aziz, Karimnagar Dist and 3 Others

Gogineni Madhava Rao Vs Sogra Banu Begam

Smt.Manne Laxmi Narsamma, Vs Mrs.K.Kalavathi , Kotha India Myadaboina Pedda Padma