The High Court disposed of a Civil Revision Petition filed against orders dismissing an application for appointment of a receiver. The Court directed the lower court to adjudicate the main suit within three months.
Direction to lower court to adjudicate main S.O.P. within three months and pass appropriate orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO iHOUSANDAND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTi.EABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
E ON IT N 170 F 21
Petition underAtlicle 227of Constitution of lndia' aggrieved by the Order dated 01/09/21in lA No 1795of 2018 in OP No'179of 2018on the file of the Court of the V ndditronal DistrrctJudge. Bhongir
Between:
YelakantiBalesh. S/o Late Kistaiah
..PET|T|ONER
AND
I I he Presrde.tSrrVasavr Kanyaka' Paran'eshwar' Arya VyshyaNitt'ya^na Sathra Sangham.v{ag,. Jrii, v,L age ano lvandat. vadadrr-B''lo4girDist''ct 2 SrVasaviKa^yaka Parani"sit"*"AivJvV="VaNrthyanra Sall'raSanqhar' YaoaoirrQuttaVrllage a,.ortlt"Jnaar' vatjaot'.-gh'on9r'Drsrrct' Rep'oy'ts"Presrdent' P;;;;; E;,;;; 516iareaai':i'tnseo os veu's nro Yadae'retrtta vil'ase a1d Ma;dal,Yadadri-BhongrrDistrict ...RESpoNDENTS/RES'.NDENTS
...RESpoNDENTS/RES'.NDENTS
For thePetitioner: SRI PAPAIAH PEDDAKULA'Advocate
For theRespondents: sRl R.A'CHARY'Advocate
The Courtmadethefollowing: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI C.R.P.No.1706 of 2021
ORDER:
This Civil ltevision Petition is flled challenging the orders o1- the Court belon'passed in I.A.No. 1795 ot'2018 in S.O.i, No.l79 o1'l0l 8 dt.0l-09-1021.
',K.i ( ti I, \rr l-lrrr ,r I rl l
income and property and the same is beingm isused bytheI '' respondent and therefore appropriate orders bepasseddirecting the Court below to appoint a receiver in order to maintainand manage the 2nd respondent-society.
by the leamed counsel for the petitioners is of the considered view that this Civil Revision Petition can be disposed of directing the
AKS.J C.R.P.No.l706 ol202l
J
C ourt belon to acljLrclicate the n.rain S.O.p. itsclf i.e. S.O.p. \r>. I79 oi- l0lli uncl puss appropriate orclcrs in uccor.cianci: rviti.r iaii. ri ithir u 1rc'i.rl .1 si*rorths tlorn the clutc .f' rccrir-rt .t'r
e rrllr ol'liti-s rrtrlcr'. I lti.r ( ttLr|t h0.-s rtOt clgtr.c:s,itl ilir\ rr11111j,1;i .1,,-, tltc nt..rits ol'tltc elise uncl thc Coirrt Lrclori is lt lrbertr t() ttu:-c ordels in i,lccor'(lancc rr ith la*' based upo. tlrc cr idcnc,-. arlciucccl by the palties.
9 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand c Iosed.
Sd/.1 SIVAPARVATHI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR ,TRUECOPY' SECTIONOFFICER
To 1. rho / arlrirrionalDistrrctJudge ?i,ox8J:.are(opuc) 2. 3. gl-: :: [ 3:i'.TZ?:i:i1*H. i6pucr 4. Two CDCoPies 5 One SPareCoPY Kj
$."l-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 110312022
SE SIA ?4:
o
(
ia
i 01 APB 2022
ri
ORDER
CRP.No.1706of 2021
DISPOSINGTHE CRP.
(c" -1'X.")
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision application praying for appointment of a receiver was rightly dismissed without appreciating contents.
Whether the main S.O.P. should be adjudicated with appropriate orders within stipulated time.
Yelakanti Balesh
The President, Sri Vasavi Kanvaka Paraneeth Arya Vysya Nitthya Sathra Sangham
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
