This order dismisses a Civil Revision Petition under Section 15 of the CPC for default due to non-prosecution, as no representative appeared for the petitioners on the date of hearing.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3218I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 11 s',t oF 2014
Petition under Section'1 15 of Civil Procedure Code, against/aggrieved by the orderdt:10.03.2014 in E.P.No.1 of 2009 in lA NO.670 of 1994 in O.S.NO.170 of 1973 on the file of lll Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad
Between:
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 3 & 9 to 12
AND
.a
.." RESPONDE NTS/l)Hrs/pETtTIONERS
- G. Laxmamma lJiedl,
't 5. B. Gopal Krishn t,
20.Smt. Aruna Devi
21 . Smt Bharathi De yi,
23.8 Vijaya Rani,
26.8 Sandhya Rani,
27.8 Manish Kumar
Respondents No.10 to 29 are Ri./o H.No.14_2_51B Goshamahal, Hyderabad
Respondents 10 o 29 are not necessary parties to petition
..fTESiPONDENTS
l.A. NO: 1 0F 201 CRI 'MP. NO: 1 597 0F 20141
Petition under S :ction 151 cpc praying that in the circrnlstances stated in the.affidavit fited in r upport of the petition, if,e Higf, Court nra,r-Ul ;E*d j" grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the oroe,r:s dl.io.oa.2ot+
passed in E.P.NO.1/2009 on the file of lll Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, including execution of warrants, pending disposal of theCRP.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PARSA, ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 9: SRI M. DEEKSHITH REDY FOR K. ANUp KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'B: ,E SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWII.RA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO. 1llil o, 2to.l4
ORDER:
None i rppears on beha_lf of the revision petitioners. Sri.M.Deeks rith Reddy, Advocate representing on behalf of Sri.K.Anoop Kumar, counsel for the respondr nt seeks to submit that matter has become infructuous. Even as per the procee lings dated I1.1O.2O22, therr: was no representation on beha,lf of the petiticners and respondents Accordingly, the matter was dir.ected to be listed today under the caption.for dismissal,. Hence, in vie'rn, of th,: proceedings ciated lI.lO.2O2i and also considering he representation of iearned counsel on behalf ol'the resporLdents, presence or representation on behalf of the petitione rs is felt essential. Accordingly, Civil Rer.ision Petition is d ismissed for default for non_prost:cution. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be nc, order as to the costs. M iscellaneous applications, if any penrling, shall stands close,1.
SDr. L N/\GALAKSHMT DE I) JN' E GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 3[:CTION OFFICER
To,
I
I The lll Addl. Ch ef Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad 2 One CC to SRt)ARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO, Adv)cate tOpUCl One CC to SRI ( ANUP KUMAR, Advocate IOPUC] c\( 4 Two CD Copies
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711A2022
ORDER
CRP.No.1151 of 2014
1tr i. S ir', i
( j?,
) 15f;B:',
':i 1,.
DISMISSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION FH,TITION FOR DEFAUI.T
FOR NON-PF.OSECUTION
@"on*.r,rw
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B Anjaiah & Ors.
K Kousalya Devi & Ors.
A. Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
