to enhance n onthly maintcnancc lrom Rs. 100()/- to [ls.10,000/ to the llrst res pondent and Rs.500l to Rs.5,()00t- to her son Subsequently, the same was cnhanced to Rs.1500/- asper the orders in(lrl MP.No.40l of 2010, dated 21.01.20 12.'l'herea{ter, rvhen the firs . respondcnt tiled pctition under Section 127 Cr.P.C in Crt.MP.N<.614 ol 20 14, the irnpugned order has heen passed. A pcrusal ol the impugned order goes to shorv that the petitioner was set expar te arrd tl-re trial Courl has taken into consideration of earnirrg capac itv ol the petitioner, who is working as Il ll Collector in GrampanclLayat,'l'horrur and drawing Rs.43,000/' and odd per month. l'ht re is no dispute with regard to cmployrncnt ol the pelitioner. Tl e pctitioncr has only madc an allcgation that thc first respondent is r.r,orking as Vidya Volunteer, bul therc is no prool placed before the trial Court to show that she is gcttirrg salary by working asvidya Volunteer. Section 127 Cr.P.O. requires the Courl to enl'ance the rnaintcnance granted under Seclion 125 Cr.P.C. o r the proof of change in the circumstances . In the said circumstanccs, I fecl that thc trial Court has rightly erhanced maintcnance lrom Rs.1500/- to ?.s.10,000/-
