Dismissed

B.Yadaiah , P.Nagabhushanam, Hyd., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Telangana HC29 Apr 2022CRLRC/568/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Criminal Revision Case was listed for hearing. It was informed that the petitioner and the second respondent were reported to have died. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the revision petition as abated and closed all pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed the Criminal Revision Case as abated due to the death of the petitioner and second respondent; closed pending miscellaneous petitions.

B.Yadaiah , P.Nagabhushanam, Hyd… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY^{NINTH DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEA'SANTHOSHREDDY}

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION^{CASE NO: 568 OF 2016}

¶6

criminal Revision^{case undersections 397 & 401 of crl.P.c against the} JudgmentinMCNo.65/2Ol2daled3lll2lzolsonthefileoftheCourtofthe Additional l\4etropolitan^{Sessions Judge for the Trial of JHCBBC-cum-Additional} Family Courl-cum-^{XXlll Additional ChiefJudge, Hyderabad'}

¶7

Between:

¶8

B.Yadaiah @ P.Naqabhushanam,^{S/o. Late} P.Venkaiah, Rl/o. H.No.^1B-3- qs\ tg t nt n. titsrrmi Naqar, Aliabad, Hyderabad'

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana,^{rep.by the PublicProsecutor'High Court'} Hvd e ra bad.

¶12

2 Sii. P.6h;bha^{Rani. W/o. B.Yadaiah} @^{P.Nagabhushanam, Housewife'}

¶13

" flfir.) Santhosh Kumar, *O e rre iflo-U.trto.^{S/o. B.Yadaiah} ZO-t-ei-3, @^P. Ninlamma^{Nagabhushanam,} Bada, Opp:tr/oosa Quadri Darga, Puranapool, Hyderabad.;

¶14

...RES,ONDENTS

¶15

CRLRCMP.^{NO: 770 OF 2016}

¶16

PetitionunderSection4S2ofCr,P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the lrilemorandum^{of groundsof criminalRevisioncase, the High court} may Oe^pleased to^{grant inteiimsuspensionof th,e order dated 31-12-2015in} f,,,1.C.No.^'65 of 2Oi2 5y^{the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judgefor the trial of} JHCBBC-cum-Additional^{Family court-cum-XXlllAdditional chiefJudge,} Hyderabad,^pending disposal^{of the above Crl.R.C.}

¶17

This petition coming^{on for hearing,upon perusingthe Memorandum of} grounds of Criminal RevLion Case and^{upon hearing the arguments of Sri} 6.N"g".r Rao,^{Advocate for the petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor} OCi*pl^{on behali of the Respondent No.1 and of 1t//s R.V.lndiraKumari,} Advocate for the Respondent^{Nos.2 & 3.}

¶18

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶19

;

¶20

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{A.SANTHOSH REDDY}

¶21

CTIIMINAL RI] VISION^{CASENo.568Ot'2016} ORDER:

¶22

I'his revision is llled^{aggrieved by theordcr} dated 31.12.2A15^{passed in M.C.No.65 o1 2012 on the file01'} Additional Merropolitan^{SessionsJudgefor trial of JubileeIlills} Car Bomb Blast^{Case-cum-Additional FamilyCourt. Hyderabad}

¶23

a No representation^{on behalfofthepetitioner.}

¶24

3 Learned counsel^{for the respondentsubmits that the petitioner} and the se'cond respondent^{whoare husbandand wife reporledly} died.

¶25

4 Whilt: recording the^{said submission,this CrirninalRevision} Case is^{rlistr.rissed} AS abated. Miscellaneous^{petitions, ilan1',}

¶26

pending shall stand^closed.

¶27

Sd/.CH.VENKATESWARULU DEPUTfEGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYII

¶28

SECTIbN OFFICER

¶29

To 1. The Additional l,4etroporitan Sessions Judge for the Triar of JHCBBC-cumAooruonar Famrry court -cum- XXlll Additional chief Judge, Hyderabad. (with records, if any)

¶30

Two CCs 1o the Public^prosecutor (TG), High Court for the State of

¶31

^{Telanganar,Hyderabad (OUT)}

¶32

9 9n" 99^t. 9I^{C.Nageswara Rao, Advocate (OPUC)}

¶33

One CC tc M/s. R.V.lndira Kumari, Advocate'(OpUC)

¶34

Two CD Copies

¶35

One Spare Copy

Kj.s

HIGH COURT

DATED:291041201,-2

i3e srAr6
,1o'
,)?.-
[2 [. i rir I[22
), ;)
+il
..?; 1/
..!,:.
-=--.-:--'

¶41

ORDER

¶42

CRLRC.No.568 of 2016

¶43

DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C. AS ABATED.

¶44

@
,,fu
x
Ur

B.Yadaiah , P.Nagabhushanam, Hyd., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Yadaiah , P.Nagabhushanam, Hyd., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

I.Sheshagiri Rao, Hyd and Anr., Vs Dr.K.Lahiri, Secunderabad and Anr, Rep Pp.

I.Sheshagiri Rao, Hyderabad and Anr., Vs Dr. K.Lahiri, Secunderabad and Anr, Rep Pp.

I.Sheshagiri Rao, Hyderabad., Vs Dr. K.Lahiri, Sec-Bad and Anr, Rep Pp.

Mohd Ayub Pasha, Secunderabad Vs State of Ts., Rep. by P.P. and Another

V. Seetamahalaxmi, Hyd., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Badri Vishal Bansal Vs the State of Ap.