Justice G. Radha Rani permitted the petitioner/accused to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case, thereby dismissing it as withdrawn while confirming the prior sentence. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
Permission to withdraw granted; Criminal Revision Case dismissed as withdrawn; prior sentence confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
CRIMINAL REVIS ION CASE NO: 112 OF 2019
Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment made in Crl.A.No.37O of 2015 dated 20.11.2015 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for Economics Offences -cum- Vll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad, Preferred against the Order rnade in C.C No. 13 of 2014 Dated 29.04.2015 on the file of the Court of the Xll Special Ivlagistrate at Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
Between:
Mohd. Ayub Pasha, S/o Late Sd Mohd. Rukumuddin, Aged about 48 years, Occ-RTC Driver, Staff No.206454, APSRTC, Musheerabad Depot-ll, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER/APPE LLANT/ACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENT
..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Judgment and sentence in Crl.A.No.37O of 2015, Dated 2011112015 on the file of the Special Judge For Economics Offences-cum-Vll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally,
7
!i rl
Hyderabad confirming the Judgment in C.C.No. 13 ot 2O14 Dated 29.04.2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Xll Special Magistrate, Somajiguda, Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAGHAVAN K THALAPAKA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI B. YUVRAJ
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE DT.IUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
CRIMINAL REVI SIONCAS E NO.112 0F 2019
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter oF this Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case
Revision Case shall stand closed. No costs.
SD/.K.SRINIVAS RAO JOINT REGI TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1910912022
1 e STAr€
.<"
^(
I
o 1 itB 2$8
oi)
<br>
ORDER
CRL.R.C.No.112 of 2019
DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C WITHOUT COSTS
(ruq'4 w-,\q*
Mohd. Ayub Pasha
State of Telangana
K. Prabhakar Reddy
Dr. Justice G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
