Dismissed

Bheemanathuni Sudhakar v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC27 Sept 2022CRLP/901/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR proceedings, the High Court of Telangana dismissed the petition as infructuous since the Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that proceedings were closed and the dispute was civil in nature.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition No.901 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions closed.

Bheemanathuni Sudhakar Vs The State of Telangana and… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^320e ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 901 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Bheemanathuni Sudhakar, S/o. Narayana, Aged 60 years, Occupation Business. The Managing Partner of Ujwala Hire Purchase and Leasing, Karimnagar, Rl/o. H. No. 2-10-1632, Chaitanyapuri, Karimnagar.

¶9

...PETITIONEFUSOLE ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its P.P. High Court for the State of Telangana, Through SHO PS, Karimnagar I Town.

¶12

Kamarapu Upender, S/o. Bhumaiah, aged 41 years, Occupation Business, Fl/o. H. No. 6-4-263, Gandhi Road, Karimnagar.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR in Crime No. 27 of 2022 on the file of the P.S. Karimnagar I Town and pass such other order or orders as the court deems fit.

¶15

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Ram Mohan Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 .

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

THE HON,}}I.E DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶18

CRIMINAL PETITION No.9Ol OF 2022

¶19

ORDER:-

¶20

This Crimina-l Petition is iiled seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.27 of 2022 of Karimnagar I Town Police Station, Karimnagar District.

¶21

No representation on petitioner's side on call

¶22

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, however, on written instructions submits that the proceedings have been closed ald a final report is filed stating that the dispute is civil in nature and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶23

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶24

Miscellaneous petitions, if arly pending, shall stand closed

¶25

¶26

SD/-I.NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To,

SECTIt#v,;;,*

1 . The Station House Officer, police Station Karimnaqar I Town. 2 Qne^{qC to Sri A.,t. Ram Mohan} ReOoy, eAvoiite tdiUCt 3 '^{Two ccs} to the^{pubric prosecutor,} tiign bourtloiihe-Stlte of rerangana at Hyderabad. IOUTI

¶31

Two CD Copies 5, One Spare Copy sbr

?t(c.,

HIGH COURT

DATED:^2710912022

T l4
<br>v
'"$
*.t
t
<br>
<br>=;:=a

¶36

ORDER

¶37

CRL.P.No.901^{of 2022}

¶38

DISMISSING^{THE CRL.P} AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶39

(+,t qYt9 g\r"<sup>N1-

Bheemanathuni Sudhakar v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bheemanathuni Sudhakar v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gujjala Gopi Vs The State of Telangana

Olympia Elevators Private Limited Vs State of Telangana

Botla Devaraju Vs The State of Telangana

Shambuni Eeranna Vs The State of Telangana

Katukojula Anil (A.1) Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd. Haji Ahmed , Ali Vs The State of Telangana