Dismissed

Banoth Narayana Singh v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and 2 Others

Telangana HC2 Sept 2022CRLP/671/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for non-prosecution. The petitioner had failed to appear with representation for multiple hearings, including today's hearing for 'dismissal'. Consequently, a petition seeking quashment of a lower court order was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition No. 671 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Banoth Narayana Singh Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE O.NAGARJUN

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITI NO: 671 OF 2016

¶8

Between:

¶9

BANOTH NARAYANA SINGH, S/o. Bheema Nayak, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Nit, Ryo. Madanapally Village, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF TELANGANA.,REP,,PP AND 2 OTHERS, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh.

¶13

Banoth Sujatha @ Nirmala, W/o. Narayana Singh, Aged about 26 years, Occ: House hold,

¶14

Banoth Divya Bharathi, D/o. Narayana Singh, Aged about 2 Years, Minor, Rep. by its natural guardian and Mother Banoth Sujatha @ Nirmala being 2nd respondent herein (Both are resident of Maktya thanda of Burugumalla Village, Parvathigiri Mandal, Warangal District.)

¶15

...RESPONOENTS/PETITION ERS

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Order in Crl.R.P. No. 12120'15 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Warangal in M.C. No-^'10 of 2013 on the file of the lll Addl. Judicial First CIass Magistrate, Warangal.

¶17

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016{CRLPMP. NO: 641 9F 2016)

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all proceedings in MC No.10/2013 on the file of the lll Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Warangal till the disposal of main petition.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CHAKRAVARTHULA VENUGOPALACHARY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondents No. 2 and 3.

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HON )UUAIILE DR.IUSI'ICE D.NA(IARJUN CR IMINAL PE'IITION No.671 of^2(t'1,6

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Cr nrinal Petition is filed seeking^quaslrment of Orcler in Crl R.P.No.l2 of 20't5 on the file ol the learued Principal Ses:ions Judge, lVarangal in M.C.No.l 0 of 2013 on the file of t re leanrecl tll Additional Jtrdicial First Class Magistrate, \' arangal.

¶24

l'l erc is r1o rcprcsentation on behalf of the petitioner. A s seen frorn the proceeding sheet, earlier for so many occasio rs there was no represerrtation for the petitioner. Today, the n atter is listetl uncler the caption'lor clismissal'. Evcn totlav there is r1o rcpreserltation <xr behalf of the petitioner ar.rt il. appears tl.rat {he petitioner is not interested in prosecuting tl re case.

¶25

In vien, of tltt: .t[.,ovc, this Criminal I'e'til.ion is liablc to be disrnisst d lor norr-prosecu tion.

¶26

)

¶27

Accorclingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed for

¶28

norl-prosecu tion. There is no order as to costs.

¶29

As a sequel, pending Misceilaneous Applications, i[^anv, shall stand closed.

¶30

SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// eD SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To, 1 . The lll Additioinal Judicial First Class Magistrate, Warangal. 2. One CC to SRl. CHAKRAVARTHULA VENUGOPALACHARY Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the Assistant PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI 4. Two CD Copies. TL

HIGH COURT

DATED:0210911t022

ORDER

CRLP.No.671 )f 2016

c STAfe
o
vz
2 0 0[1 ?ffil iC)
\ .r'i.
,:,
. -'= ir.ii ;-"

¶37

DISMISSING.I HE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶38

FOR NON- PRO: ECUTION

¶39

)
o?3
// t,

Banoth Narayana Singh v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banoth Narayana Singh v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Moiz Hussain Vs The State of Telangana

Singirala Sathyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana And Another

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Nizamabad Dist. Vs Kothamandi Kishan Rao, Nizamabad Dist., and 2 Ano.

V.Laxman Reddy Vs M/s. Bhavani Mills, rep. by its Prop. Third B. Harish Patel

M/S Sri Vigneswara Rythu Depot, Nellore and Another Vs the State of Tg., Rep. by P.P. and Another

Mohd. Imran Khan Vs L. Satyanarayana and Another