Dismissed

Mr. Mithun Mannava v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Aug 2022CRLP/5825/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana disposed of a Criminal Petition filed to quash criminal proceedings in Crime No. 542 of 2021. After recording the Assistant Public Prosecutor's submission that the charge sheet was laid, the Court dismissed the petition, granting liberty to file a fresh one if cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed; liberty granted to move fresh petition if cause survives; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Mr. Mithun Mannava Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAO

¶2

. TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY^{THIRD DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUSTICECHILLAKUR SUMALATHA}

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO: 5825 OF 2021}

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 Mr. Mithun l\ilannava,^{S/o. Tulasi Ram Prasad,Aged about- 31 years,} Occ.Architect,^{Rio.Flat No. 102, SS PrimeView Apartments, ts-40, Road} No.7, Filmnagar,^{Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad}

¶8

V.Tarakeswar Rao, S/o^LateSriram Murthy, Aged 52 years, Occu^pation.Em PloYment,

¶9

Smt. V.Nalini, Wo^{Mr.VTarakeswar} Rao, Aged 50 years, Occupation. Employment^{(Both are R/oNalini} Vallurupalli, B Appaloosa drive,North Grafton,^{MA 01536.USA)}

¶10

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED'S

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,HighCourt of} Judicature of Telangana,^{At Hyderabad.}

¶13

K.Gowthama Siddardhudu,^{S/o MallikarjunaRao,Aged 62 years,} -

¶14

Oci.Oirector of M/s Shri Lakshmi Ganalathy lndustries Pvt Ltd, A Private iiriteO Comprny,^{FlatNo.'101,Arun Apartments, Red Hills, Lakdikapool,} Hyderabad^- 4.

¶15

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶16

Petition under section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circu.mstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminalPetition,the Highcourt may '} be pleased toto call^{for the recordsin crime No. 542 of 2021on the file of} Kukatpally Station,^{Police Station, Cyberabad}

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminalPetition,the High courtmaybe} pleased to grant stay of all further^{proceedingsin crimeNo. 542 of 2021on lhe} file of Kukatpally Police^{Station, Cyberabad.}

¶19

This Petition coming on^{for hearing,upon perusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal Petition^{and upon hearing the argumentsof sri K v BHANU} PRASAD ,Advocate for^{the Petitionerand the Assistant Public Prosecutor on} behalf of the Respondent^{No.1 and of sri M. SHARATH KUMARAdvocate for the} Respondent No.2

¶20

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶21

THE HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5825 OF 2O2L

¶22

ORDER:-

¶23

1 . The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioners rvho are arrayed as Accused Nos.1,3 and 4 in Crime No.542 of 2O2l of Kukatpally Police Station, Cyberabad.

¶24

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that charge sheet is laid ald therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶25

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to move a lresh petition in case cause survlves.

¶26

Misceilaneous petitions, if arry pending, shall stand closed.

¶27

//TRUE COPY//

¶28

SD/-,K. ONESIM DEpurY,+fggBAR SECYION OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

The Station^{House Officer, Kukatpally Police Station'Cyberabad}

¶31

2' Two CCs to^{the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana,At Hyderabad} 3 One CC to SRl.^{K V BHANU PRASADAdvocate [OPUC]}

¶32

4 One CC to SRl.^{M. SHARATHKUMARAdvocate IOPUC]}

¶33

Two CD^CoPies

¶34

One Spare^CoPY

GJP -\'

HIGH COURT

csL,J

DATED:2310812022

ORDER

1 l: i' 9 :-ri t5
/.
{t
C, ri)
1E t;[l ?$a
\O -5
t ilr li ili:

¶41

CRLP.No.5825 of 2021

¶42

DISMISSIN THE

¶43

CRIMINAL PETITION N

Mr. Mithun Mannava v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Mithun Mannava v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harish Rawtani and 3 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Musuku Pranay Vs Ailuri Brahma Reddy

Racherla Rajender Vs The State of Telangana

Burri Sandeep Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Tanneru Raja Sekhar Vs The State of Telanana, And Another

Sri .Varun Raju Vatchavai Vs The State of Telangana