Court allowed criminal petition seeking bail for petitioners A6 & A7 accused of narcotics offences. Granted bail on condition of personal bond and police appearance.
Petitioners A6 & A7 granted bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5625 of 2022
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 437 & 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,’ 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) seeking to enlarge the petitioners/A6 & A7 on bail in connection with Crime No.21 of 2022, on the file of Chityal Police Station, Nalgonda District for the offences punishable under Section 20(b) (ii) (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2
on their executing personal bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with two sureties for like sum each, among which one is local surety and the other is native surety, to the satisfaction of I Additional District and
3
Sessions Judge-cum-Designated Court for the trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Nalgonda.
ii. On such release, the petitioners/A6 & A7 shall appear before the concerned Police Station on every Sunday between 10.30 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. for a period of three months or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation.
iii. The petitioners/A6 & A7 shall comply with the conditions as laid down under Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.
________________ K.SURENDER, J
Date :06.07.2022 tk
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5625 of 2022 Dt.06.07.2022
tk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to petitioners involved in narcotics offence given lack of direct recovery evidence implicating them.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
A6 & A7
State
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
