Dismissed

D.Vijay Deepak v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC17 Aug 2022CRLP/4354/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana heard a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR and interim stay. No representation was filed by petitioners. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted a charge sheet was filed, rendering the petition infructuous. Petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed with liberty to move fresh petition if cause survives.

D.Vijay Deepak Vs State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

I I

¶2

l I Ii i Ii I I

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4354 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

D.Vijay Deepak, S/o.D. Rama Rao, Occ. Pvt Employee, Aged about 36 years, R/o.Plot No.175, Flat.No.105, Sri Thulasi Residency, Road No.5, KTR Colony, Nizampet, RR District 500 090.

¶10

Smt.D.Vijaya Lakshmi, Wo.D.Rama Rao, Occ. House wife Aged about 65 '' years, Rl/o.Plot No. 175, Flat.No.105, Sri Thulasi Residency, Road No.5, KTR Colony, Nizampet, RR District 500 090.

¶11

I 3.' Smt. G.Swathi Bindu, Wo.Gandreti Ramesh, Occ. House wife Aged about 39 years, Rl/o.Plol No.224, Flat No.102, Ajay Complex, Near Oldage Home, Miyapur, Hyderabad.

¶12

Smt. Hima Bindh.p, D/o.D.Rama Rao, Occ. House wife Aged about 41 years, Rl/o.1 5-1 1-32, 4'" Floor, Sri Sai Nilayam Apartments, VDOs Colony,

¶13

" Khammam Haveli' Khamm"'o'tt''ll.rarroNERS/AccusED

¶14

Nos.1 To 4

¶15

AND

¶16

State of Telangana, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

¶17

Smt.Danana Anitha, W/o.Vijay Deepak, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Software Engineer, R/o.H.No-1/17, Sai Prasanna Colony, Near liilasjith, Dammaiguda, Hvderabad - 500 083

¶18

...RES'.NDENTS

¶19

. Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No.41812021, dated '18.5.2021 on the file of PS Bachupally, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, as against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 herein

¶20

l.A. NO: 2OF 2021

¶21

!^',

¶22

i Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in FIR No.41Bl2O21 , dated 18.5.2021 on the file of PS Bachupally, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, including the arrest of the Petitioners herein, pending disposal of the above criminal petition

¶23

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KONA N.D.V.RAMANA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.'t and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

I I I

¶26

¶27

THE HON'I LE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUTT SUI4,{.LATHA

¶28

Cll MINAL PETITION No.4354 of 2Oitl

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Seekin , to quash the proceedings that zr-e initiated against the petitioners through FIR No.418 ol' 2O2l of Bachupa111, 'olice Station, Cvberabad Distri<:t, l he present Criminal Pet tion is filed.

¶31

No rr rresentation on petitioners' sidr: on call. Hou,ever, th : learned Assistant Public Prosecu-:r submits, on instructi 'ns, that on completion of invr:stige.l ion, charge sheet is lai< arrd, hence, the Criminal Pel,ition l:.as become infructuou s

¶32

Recor, ing the said submission, this CrinL.Lnal Petition is dismissr: , however, granting liberty to the petitioners to move a fres r Criminal Petition, in case th,: caus,c survrves.

¶33

¶34

As a equel, miscellaneous petitions pr:rrCing, if any, shall stand closed.

¶35

Sd/-T.JAYASREE ASSIS;TANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// r-'1l:'>""SECTION^OFFICER

¶36

¶37

The ll^{Additior al Junior CivilJudge-cum-X AdditionalMr>lropolitan Magistrate'} ai.[["{iglj,trJj"*",rr",:.:::l,l',+i!,?,fu^{ffi i??,i,1lxi15t;orreansana} at Hvderabacl^(OUT)

¶38

One CC^{to Sr Kona N'D'V'RamanaRao' Advocate [OFUC]}

¶39

Two^{CD CoP :s}

¶40

One^{SPareCl rPY}

Kj - ,&..-

i I I I I i I I I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1710812022

I I i

ORDER

CRLP.No.4354 ol'. )2.1

¶48

4
/t, r{=.m\.\,r<br>({
\u\ ?fll jril
io t $ .+.tl
\ /t ,/
-/
{

¶49

DISMISSING THE CRL.P. I c6) \7 .shy ,r&\o

D.Vijay Deepak v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Vijay Deepak v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kadire Mahipal, Vs The State of Telangana

Boddupally Lingaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Velaga Ram Mohan Rao Vs State of Telangana

Kurumilla Ajay Vs Vangapally Thirumala

Kasireddy Bhaskar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Gorite Satyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana