Dismissed

Prabhakar Reddy Pannala v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC20 Sept 2022CRLP/3665/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashment of proceedings under Section 504 IPC and the SC/ST Act was dismissed as infructuous because the investigation was completed and a charge-sheet was filed by the time of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No.3665 of 2020 dismissed as infructuous. Permission to challenge the charge-sheet is granted subject to filing pendingilogue applications.

Prabhakar Reddy Pannala Vs The State of Telangana and… — Caste Atrocities | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

[^32se ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY. THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3665 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

Prabhakar fteddy Pannala, S/o. Laxmi Narsimha Reddy, aged 83 years, Occ. Retd., Employee, R/o H.No.6-10-2914. Old lVlalakpet, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

¶9

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.,I

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Publjc Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶12

2 Mailaram Venkatesh, S/o Late Ramulu, aged 30 years, Occ: Vrce-Sarpanch, R/o Anajipuram Village, Bhongir Village and Mandal, Rachakonda, Telangana State.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No 22812020 dated 0210812020 of P.S., Bhongir (R), Rachakonda, against the Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶15

CRL.P/|.A. NO: 1 OF 2020

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.22812020 dated 02-08-2020 of P.S., Bhongir (R), Rachakonda, against the Pet^{jtioner/Accused} No.1, pending disposal of the Main Quash Petition in the interest of the justice.

¶17

Thi:; Petit .,n coming on for hearing, upon perusing tlrt: lilernorandum of Grounds of Cri rrinal Petition and upon hearing the irrgr nrerrts of Sri. P VAIVSHEEDHAR REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner anc r;f 1l^e Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) ,n behalf of the Respondent No.1 and o1 Sr. P PRABHAKAR REDDY Advocat for the Respondent No.2.

¶18

The Court made re following: ORDER

¶19

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE D,NAGARJUN

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION No.3665 oF 2O2O

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This Criminai Petition is filed undcr Scctiot't 482 ol the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner- accused No.l to quash the proceedings initiated asainst l-rim in Crime No.22B of 2O2O of Bhongir Rr-rral Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, registe rcd for t hc oflcnces under Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code,3(l)(s) SCs & STs (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 201 5.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner accused No.l is present.

¶24

Learned Assistant Public Proseclrtor appci.rring for respondent No. 1-State has submitted tl-rat during pendency of this criminai petition, the Policc concerned have completed the investigation and filed charge-sheet before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bhongir, and the same was taken on file vide C.C.No.B10 of 2O2O. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has filed a letter dated 25.O4.2022 addressed by the Sub lr.rspector ol Police, Bhongir Rural Police Station, Rachakonda

¶25

¶26

Cc.,mmissionc irte, to the Public Prosecutor of the l-ligh Court t,l sullr -i.r.lr'.iate thc same

¶27

[rr vie. of the above submissioll, si t( e entire rnvestil3tioi-t is completed and charge shcet is rt1s,c, filed, the vcr 1' pu' r()se of filing the criminai petition to quash Crime No.2l I of 2O2O of Bhongir Rural Policr' Station,

¶28

R:rchal<ir,ncla Cornmissionerate, is defeated ancL thel c:bv the Cr-inlir^;rl Pe tiorr has become infructuous ancl liir.Ll: to bc d isnri s sr:<l

¶29

n('cor( rnqly, tl-re Criminal Petition is clis--nissed as infructuous Hou,ever, the petitioner is grrree libertl' to challe r-riy' tl r r:l.large sheet, if he so desire

¶30

Pt'ndi g ivliscellaneous Applications, if ;rr.r', shall

¶31

stand close l

¶32

$D/- T.SRINIVAS DEr)U1Y REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' u)

¶33

To,

¶34

SiEI]TION OFFICER

¶35

1 Prinicipal Jud^'iaj l't Class Magistrate at Bhongir, Nalgorrda Drstrict

¶36

2 SHO, Bhongir R) Police Station, Rachakonda, Nalgonda District. 3 Two CC to Sr PUBLTC PROSECUTOR [S) Advocate [OUT]

¶37

4 One CC to S^..t P VAMSHEEDHAR REDDy Advocate [OpUC] 5 One CC to Sf l. P PRABHAKAR REDDY, Advocate tOpJCl 6 Two CD Cop ,rs 7 One Spare C py KAR

0\p

HIGH COUR T

DATED:2010012022

ORDER

a
I
i; (it
lE s{,
rk* ,

¶43

CRLP.No.36t'5 of 2020

¶44

DISMISSING }RlMINAL PETITION

¶45

AS INFRUCTI IOUS

¶46

^rY

Prabhakar Reddy Pannala v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhakar Reddy Pannala v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banavath Ravi and 2 others Vs The State Of Telangana

V.Murali Krishna Vs Sri M.Yadi Reddy and State of Telangana, Rep by P.P

Sri Dokuri Ravinder Reddy, Vs Sri Manda Yadi Reddy

Kunam Raghava Reddy, Jubille Hills., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Yasam Pocham, Adilabad Dist. Vs Sho, Ps Mancherial, Adilabad Dist. and Ano

Smt. Bittu Sunitha Rani, Vs The State of Telangana