Smt. Dr. Anuradha Vemula v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCCRLP/253/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No:…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
¶2
MAIN CASE No: CRL.P.Nos.189 and 253 of 2021
¶3
PROCEEDING SHEET
¶4
| Sl. No. |
DATE | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26.06.2025 | EVV,J None appears for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramanjaneyulyu, learned counsel representing Mr. T.Surya Satish, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent(s) would submit that at the request of the unofficial respondent(s), Mr. T.Surya Satish, learned counsel has given NOC Vakalat, hence seeks to delete his name from the cause list. |
Transferred to IO folder before making corrections |
|
| The Registry is directed delete the name of T.Surya Satish from the cause list and issue urgent notice to the unofficial respondent(s). Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State is also permitted to take out personal notice to the unofficial respondent(s) through the concerned SHO and file proof of service in the Registry. List on 10.07.2025. |
|||
| ________ EVV,J vsu |
¶5
2
¶6
| Sl. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | NOTE |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/253/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court