Disposed

Mr Manne Rajwardhan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Dec 2022CRLP/2373/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Investigating Officer to conclude the investigation in FIR No.19 of 2022 without arresting the petitioner. The petitioner must cooperate with the inquiry, and documentary evidence submitted will be considered.

What did the court decide?

Directed Investigating Officer to conclude investigation of FIR No.19 of 2022 without arresting petitioner; petitioner to cooperate.

Mr Manne Rajwardhan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2373 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Mr. IVlanne Rajwardhan Reddy, S/o. Mohan Reddy, Age 46 years, Occ. Agricultural & Contractor, R/o H.No.42-271111N6, Nandhi Hills, Wanaparthy District, Telangana State

¶8

...Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶11

Bogum Laxmaiah, S/o. Narsimulu, Age: 61 years, Occ. Rtd. Govt. Employee, R/o. Plot no 106, Tirumala Residency, Behind GHN{C LB Nagar Pochama Bagh Saroor Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

Respondents/Complainant

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in F.l.R No.19 of 2022 pending on the file of PS Wanaparthy Rural, Wanaparthy District.

¶14

f .A. NO: 2 OF 2022

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^may be^pleased to stay of all further^proceedings or investigations^{in CrimeNo.'19of} 2022 pending on the file of PS Wanaparthy Rural, Wanaparthy^{Districtincluding} arrest of the Petitioner / Accused^{No.1 .}

¶16

This Petition^{coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal^Petition and^uponhearing the^arguments of Sri^N. BHUJANGA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri SINGAIM SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate for tre Respondent No.2,

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

Crl.Petition No.2373 of 2022

¶19

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2373 OF 2022

¶22

ORD ER:

¶23

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 oF the Code of Criminal Procedure, t973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioner-Accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in FIR No.19 of2022 pending on the file of Station House Officer, Wanaparthy Rural Police Station, Wanaparthy District.

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-Accused No.1 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. Perused the material on record.

¶25

The case of the respondent No.2 - de facto complainant is that false documents were prepared by the Accused with the assistance of Village Revenue Officer of Rajapet Village and others. For the said fabrication of unregistered sale deed document dated 02.12.2009 showing that the respondent No.2 - complainant has affixed his thumb impression, the^present complaint is filed.

¶26

¶27

As seen from the allegations, the incident happened in the^year 2009 and the said case is based on documents.

¶28

Crl.Petition No.2373^of 2022

¶29

¶30

5, For the said reason, this Court deems appropriate to direct the Investigating Officer in respect of FIR No.19 of 2022 pending on the file of Station House Officer, Wanaparthy Rural Police Station, Wanaparthy District to conclude the investigation without arresting the^petitioner- Accused No. 1.. Further, the^petitioner shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required for the^purpose of investigation. Needless to say, the documentary evidence^produced by the petitioner at the time of investigation shall be considered by the Investigating Officer.

¶31

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed off.

¶32

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶33

SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

ri,--

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Wanaparthy.

¶38

The Stal:ion House Officer, Wanaparthy Rural Police Station, Wanaparthy District.

¶39

Two CCs to the Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶40

One CC to SRl. N. BHUJANGA RAO, Advocate IOPUC]

¶41

One CC to SRl. SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate IOPUC]

¶42

6 Two CD Copies

PSR .*=' "{

HIGH COURT

KS, J

DATED: 011121202.2

ORDER

20 uH

CRLP.No.2373 of 201'.2

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE^I::RIMINAL PETITION

¶51

-\J-
'l-
/

Mr Manne Rajwardhan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Manne Rajwardhan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravikanti Saroja Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Panaganti Jyothi Vs The State of Telangana

Gajjala Keshav Sai Krishna Goud , Keshavulu Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Laxman Babu Cheruku and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Chintapandu Naveen Kumar , Teenmar Mallanna and another Vs State of Telangana and another

Nitin Suntwal Vs The State of Telangana and another