Disposed

Mohammed Azeemullah Qureshi and 5 others v. The State Of Telangana and another

Telangana HC1 Jul 2022CRLP/2054/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the withdrawal of Criminal Proceedings No. 2054 of 2022, a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C regarding the quashing of proceedings in FIR No. 441 of 2021. Permission to withdraw was granted with liberty to file a fresh petition.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition is granted with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Mohammed Azeemullah Qureshi and 5 others Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION No: 2054 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 Mohammed Azeemullah Qureshi, S/o. Mohammed Nayeemullah Qureshi, (Wrongly Shown in F.l.R. as Azeem Qureshi, S/o.tr/iyaullah Qureshi), aged about 28 years, Fyo. 11-4-490, Bazar Guard, Red Hills, VTC Hyderabad, Hyderabad District - 500004.

¶8

2 Ghousia Begum, W/o. Mohammed Nayeemullah Qureshi, (Wrongly Shown in F.l.R. as Gousiya Begurn Wo. Miyaullah Qureshi), aged about 45 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o.11-4-490, Bazar Guard, Red Hills, Hyderabad - 500004.

¶9

3 Mohammed Raheemullah Qureshi, S/o. Mohammed Nayeemullah Qureshi, (Wrongly Shown in F.l-R. as Raheeni S/o. Miyaullah Quresni;, aged about 27 years, R/o.11-4-490, Bazar Guard, Red Hills, VTC. Hyderabad-, Hyderabad District - 500004.

¶10

4 Mohammed Faheemullah Qureshi, S/o. Mohammed Nayeemullah eureshi, (Wrongly Shown in F.l.R. as Faheem S/o. Miyaullah Qureshi), aged about 23 years, Rl/o. 1 1-4-490, Bazar Guard, Red Hills, Hyderabad - 500004.

¶11

5 Moharnmed Mohsinullah Oureshi, S/o. Moharhmed Nayeemullah Qureshi, (Shown in F.l.R. as Mousin S/o. Miyaullah Qureshi Rep. by his lVlother Ghousia Begum, aged about^,16 years, Occ. Minor,^cJo. 11-4-490, Bazar Guard, Red Hills, Hyderabad - 500004.

¶12

6 Mohammed Mateenullah Qureshi, S/o. Mohammed Nayeemullah Qureshi, (Shown in F.l.R. as Mathin S/o. Miyaullah Qureshi), aged about 21 years, Rl/o. 11-4-490, Bazar Guard, Red Hills, WC. Hyderabad, Hyderabad District - 500004.

¶13

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 to 6

¶14

AND

¶15

1 . The State Of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana.

¶16

Smt. Ferdose Begum, Wo. Azeent Qureshi, aged about 21 years, Occ: Housewife, trJo. 16-8-6251216/4, New Malakpet, Saidabad, Sahifa, Hyderabad - 500024.

¶17

..RESPONDENT

¶18

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to Quash all further proceedings in FIR No. 4411202i dated 2110612021 of wps, DD Police Station, Hyderabad District

¶19

l.A. NO:1 oF 2022

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in No. 441t2021 dated 21-06_2021of wps, DD Police Station, Hyderabad District, incruding arrest of the petitioners

¶21

COMMON CT IN IA NOS 2 AND 3 0F 2022

¶22

Between

¶23

Smt. Ferdose pe-Sqr, W/o. Azeem eureshi,Occ. Housewife aged about 21 ygqls^ryo. 500024 1 6-8-62s I 21 6 I A, New Ma ta kpet, Saida bad, Sahif., fr-y;;fi;;--'

¶24

. Petitioner/ 2nd Respondent

¶25

AND

¶26

Mohammed Azeemulah eureshi S/o. A,4ohammed Nayeemuflah eureshi. (!vro1O_!y Shown in F.t.R. as Azeem euresr,i slo rr,livarliii Oi,i"'rni. '""J"j about 28 years, Rl/o. 11-4-490, Bazar Guird', R; Hit[:'"WE: Wj3;ri%:: Hyderabad District - 500004.

¶27

2 pfgrX P9g:l,W{", Mohammed Nayeemuilah eureshi. (Wrongty Shown in r.r.x. as Uoustya tsequm W/o. fr,4iyaullah eureshi), aqed about +dVears, Oci. Housewife, Rl/o.'1^'1-4-490, Bazar Guard nea Hlfs^"f-f V"Oerabad _ SOd0 .' ---'

¶28

3 Mohammed Raheemultah eureshi. sir Hrronailmrio r.fiye"rrfrJi-Ouresni, ygqrg, (Wrongly Shown in F.l.R. R/_o,'!1-4-490, Bazar Guard. as Raheem Red Sro Hiils, H,,vauiian-Orre'.iD, vTC. Hyd;r;iirol-Hvii.#tro;d; "#;r; District - 500004.

¶29

4 Mohammed Faheemulrah eureshi, S/o. Mohammed Nayeemulah eureshi. (Wrongly Shown in F t.R as Faheem slo rr,l viurrarrb;;;';ii ;siil #;iii years, Rl/o. 1 1 _1-!50. Bazar Guard Red Hilts, irvO.irOrO _ 500004.

¶30

5 Monammed l\4ohsinullah Qureshi. S/o. tVlohammed Nayeemullah eureshi. L9hown^{in F.t.R. as l\rlousin s/o} Miyaulih:Ori"rhi H"p ov'-i.iir*vfi,i'"i Ghousia Beguln, aged about.16 yeais, Occ. ttrilnor, ny".'fi_'+_+'S-o,''Bilii Guard, Red Hitls. Hyderabad - 500004.

¶31

6 Mohammed lVlateehullah eureshi, S/o. Mohammed Nayeemullah eureshi, (shown in F.r.R. as Mathin S/o tr,,4rvauilah eur"irrii, ,gea "oori 2r veiri,Hlol 500004.11-4-490,^{BazarGuard. RedHitis,} wc Hyoer5ba"C, Ht;;;;br,i ;;;i;i"-

¶32

Respondents/Petitioners

¶33

///

¶34

¶35

The State Of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana.

¶36

..RespondenVRespondent

¶37

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2022

¶38

Petition under Section 320(6) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of compromise petition well as the grounds it is therefore prayed permit the petitioner compound the offence in FlR. 44111021 of WPS, DD Police Station Hyderabad District, Telangana State against all the accused

¶39

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022

¶40

Petition under Section 320(2) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to record the compliant compound the offences and quash the proceedings in FIR No.441 12021 ol WPS, DD Police Station,Hyderabad District, Telangana State as against all the accused

¶41

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SMT K PALLAVI ,Advocate^{for the Petitionerand of the Public Prosecutor (TG)on behalf} of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri l\4ohammed Vaseeuddin Advocate for the Respondent No. 2

¶42

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶43

0 I

¶44

THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION No.2054 OF 2022

¶45

ORDER:

¶46

The lcarned counsel for the petitioner, on inskuctions, would submit that the Investigating Officer in Cr.No.44l of 2022 pt:r.rclirrg on the file of Women Police Station, DD policc Station,. Hyclerabacl, I-ras completed investigation and laid charge shcct.

¶47

Lr view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks pcn.rrission of this Court to withdraw this Crimirrtl l)ctition rvith tt libr:rty to file fresh petition.

¶48

l)ermissior-r is accorcled.

¶49

Actordingh,, this Criminal Petition is dismisseci as

¶50

withdrawr.r, granting libcrtv to the petitioners to file fresh

¶51

petitior-r. l.hcre shall Lre no orclcr as to costs.

¶52

¶53

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall

¶54

star-rd closcd.

¶55

¶56

Sd/- N' CHANDRASHEKAR^RAO ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY/i t{)l'-',';-. --SECTION^OFFICER

¶57

¶58

To, 1. The Station^{Hotrse Officer WPS' D D' PoliceStation' Hyderabad'} 2. Two^{CCs to Publicpr.otJ"'to',H'Sfr Court for the State of Telangana at}

¶59

Hvderabad^(OUT)

¶60

3 di,;"bCi;^{'sRt.HrtonammedVaseeuddin' Advocate [OPUC]}

¶61

i. 6ii" 66 i; sMf^{x pnlrRvr Advocate [oPUC]}

¶62

Two^{CD CoPies}

¶63

One SPare^CoPY

r/SL

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0110712022

h 7i-
t
/:i
C)o 1 B AUE 2022
'<,
*
tjri C ,

¶69

ORDER

¶70

CRL.P.No.2054 of 2022

¶71

DISMISSING THE CRL.P
AS WITHDRAWN
ho--
{"@

Mohammed Azeemullah Qureshi and 5 others v. The State Of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Azeemullah Qureshi and 5 others v. The State Of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Naseeha Vs State of Telangana and another

Smt. Pambanda Sunitha Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Pambanda Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Dara Veklesh Raj Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Akheel Vs Mohammed Abdul Waheed

Chintalapelli Ram Reddy Vs Seva Eslavath