Criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C regarding quashing of DVC No.207 of 2015. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous in view of the compromise between parties.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous pending tied up in compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
CRIMINAL PETITIO NO: 1692 OF 2016
Between:
M. Satish Kumar, S/o. I/. Srinivas Rao, Occ: Asst Professor, Department of Oncological Sciences, [Mount Sinai Medical Centre, New York USA, Presently residing at H.No.304, Kaling fort, Sreet No.4, KJ, Colony, Moulali-4O. Rangi Reddy District, Telangana State.
...Petitioner
AND
... Responde nts
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the DVC No.207 of 2015 on the file of the lV tr/etropolitan lVlagistrate, Erramanzil, at Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(CRLPMP. NO: 1603 OF 2016 )
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Quash Petition in DVC.No.207 ot 2015 on the file of the lV lvletropolitan lvlagistrate, Erramanzil, at Hyderabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Naraparaju Avaneesh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.l and of Sri B.V.S.S. Bala Krishna Ranjit, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE HOIIOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. RADH,d RANT
C] IIMINAL PETITION No.1692 of2016
ORDER:
Learned < ounsel for petitioner submittecl that the rnatter ended
in compromise i nd the petition becomes infl.uctr.ro Lts.
Hence, th s criminal petition is dismissed as infructrrou:;.
Pending rriscellaneous applications, ifany, shall stand r:losed.
SDi.T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
t . ll')
SEC']IION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2510112O22
ORDER
CRLP.No.1692 of201€
e
'( c\L
2022
1 1 t tB
Jo)'Y
\ks*re?{+
DISMISSINGTHE CRIMINAL PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS
(9 $fl"-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition for quashing proceedings becomes infructuous upon compromise.
Whether proceedings would be stayed versus directly dismissed on compromise.
Interpretation of Section 482 Cr.P.C in cases of settlement.
M. Satish Kumar
State of Telangana
Harini
DR. G. RADHA RANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
