Dismissed

B.V.S. Someshwar v. State of Ap., Rep through the P.P and Anotehrs

Telangana HC8 Feb 2022CRLP/14169/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court placed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for hearing. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous. The Court recorded this submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous, closing any pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; petition dismissed as infructuous.

B.V.S. Someshwar Vs State of Ap., Rep through… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY,THE E]GHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY' TWo THoUSAND aruo rwerury rwb

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14169 OF 2013

¶6

Between:

¶7

R;Yil'?Pi"',,ii,Ytsf'S; i;ll?3i,ll,',i.T#,lSi;'.1,il,iiji;1.&,llliji' R/o F,at

¶8

.....PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

STATE OF Ap., REp THROUGH TH_E public prosecutor, Represented by its public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra praOein, Avoiirba,6.,.-

¶11

Ponugoti Narasimha Rao S/o^.tyuddul RaoAge:45 years, Occ: agricutture R/o.H.No. 7i9, New Bahar, Sahara Ertat"i r,r;nr#iu-Jo] csl post, Hyderabad

¶12

.,, RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the cjrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds.of cn m,a r' peiitio,n, ir,,,l iirq; court may be pteased to quash the^proceedinqs in CC.NO.263i20r: ""'tn" ;l;;; il rX Speciat Magisrrate at Hastinapuram, Ranga Reddy Oistrict aqainsi tn; ;.;;;";;

¶14

L M o

¶15

Pe tion under Section 4g2 gf _C,r. .p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the r"lemorandum of Grounds.of criminar'p;iilioln, in" ri,gn court may be preased to grant stay of further proceedings in cc.r.ro.zo:Tzbiion i|," rir" of the Ix speciar Magistrate at Hastjnapuram. Ranga Reddy Oistrici inctuOing personat appearance of

¶16

This^petiUon coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the argumen-ts of sri N v ANANTHA KRISHNA ,Advocate for the pertioner and the pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

l I

¶19

¶20

THE HON'BLE^{Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA}

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION^{No.14169 of 2O13}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Learned counsel for the^{petitioner submits thatthe} matter has become^{infructuous and, therefore,itmay be} dismissed.

¶24

Recording the said submission,^{this CriminalPetitionis} dismissed as infructuous.

¶25

¶26

To,

¶27

Miscellaneous^{petitions pending, ifany, shallstand} closed.

¶28

SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSTSTAN/EXEGISTRAR ,rRuEcoPY,

¶29

,r-*;;;.;;

¶30

¶31

^1,^{lhe IX Special Magistrate at_Hastinapuram, Ranga Reddy District} 2. rhe station Housebfficer. I q.lt_T.?Iis. Nlgi;iiJ.ii li.{oiy District l. lne^cg^{to sRrN v ANANTHA KRTs"HNA} A;v;Et iopilti*" 4. Two CCs to eUBLTC pROSECtrrOR, High Coraidi th; ifle ofTelangana at Hyderabad [OUT)5. Two CD Cop-ies

NP] r rV( '

HIGH COURT

DATED:QalO2l2022

I trg sier{:
o;
.)
O
J 2 S rtB 2022
,,9

¶36

ORDER

¶37

CRLP.No.14169 of 2013

¶38

¶39

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

B.V.S. Someshwar v. State of Ap., Rep through the P.P and Anotehrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.V.S. Someshwar v. State of Ap., Rep through the P.P and Anotehrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ingu Rajeshwari, Adilabad Dt and 2 Otrs., Vs Narla Srinivas, Adilabad Dt and Anr, Rep Pp.

Vainala Ramesh, Warangal Dist. and Ano Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano

Smt. K.Nagar Lakshmi, Vs Rachana Jaiswal

J. Sunitha, Hyd and 2 Others Vs State of a.P., Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Rahat Unnisa, Hyd and 2 Othrs., Vs Qamar Sultana, Hyd and Anr., Rep Pp.

M.Bikshapathly Vs State of Ap., Rep by Its P.P and Anothers