Held the criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to be infructuous and disposed of it without adjudication on merits.
Criminal Petition No. 13274 of 2011 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13274 OF 2011
Between:
Smt. M.Madhumathi, W/o Shankar Reddy Business R/o13-7,Lothukunta,Alwal, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3
AND
...RES,.NDENT/DEFA.r. coM'LATNANT
Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the High Court maybe pleased to call for the records in CC.No.315/2008 on the file of the Vl Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Cyberabad andquash theproceedings thereinin so far as the petitioner in concerned on theground of abuseof the process of law
CRLPMP. NO: 15119 OF 2011
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the HighCourt may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner herein in C.C.No.315/2008 on the file of the Vl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, pending disposal of the above Crl.P.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing theMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and uponhearingthe argumentsof Sri SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant.Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of None Appearedfor Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
rIoN'Ill.E stil .tIrs'l tct.r .s \TItosl I Rr.r)t)\
( ltlN''llNAl. P['l'l I IO\ \o. l-]27-l ot'l() I I
oRI)I,rtt
'[ he Crirninal Pctition is lllcd to cluash C.('. No I I i ol']008 on the llc o1- VI Mctropolitarr Maeistlatc, Mcdchal.( r'hcrrhacl.
[.,earncd counscl lbr thc pctitioncr subrnittccl tllrt rlrc rnattcr has bccornc in liuctuor-rs
Whilc rccording thc subnrission ol'lcalnccl coLurscl lbr thc petitioncr, thc(lrinrinal Pclition is disrnissccl ns har int hrccorrc inlructuous
Misccllancous pctitions, il' anr . pcnclinll t tlr is r'r'inr inaI
pctition, sha ll stand closcd.
sd/-K. ILESHI DEPUTY R RAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATIID:2210712022
N;;t.
)\
14 SEP 2
Wi}
,tl/i
ORDER
CRLP.No.'13274 of 2011
THE CRL.P. IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
Ar,t 00 ,Ylq66 Po?L
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. M. Madhumathi
The State of A.P.
S.R. Vanamala Lingam
Justice A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
