This single-sentence order dismisses a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the cause for the petition does not exist.
Criminal Petition No. 12299 of 2015 was dismissed as infructuous and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\ \
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSHREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12299OF 2015
Between:
Ch. Narasimha Reddy, S/o. LateCh Malla .Reddy, Fl/o. H. No.3-12-31, Ganesh Nagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad
...PET]TIONER/ACCUSED NO.2
AND
...REspoNDENT/coMpLArNANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in P.R.C. No. 5 of2014 on the file of Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,Hyderabad.
CRLPMP. NO: 12287 OF 201s
Petition under Section482 ofCr.P.Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including theappearanceof the petitioner inp.R.C. No. 5 of 2Oi4 on the fite ofXll AdditionalChief 1rr'letropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Fetition andupon hearing theargumentsof STi.T.PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY,Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the RespondentNo.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSHREDDY
CBIMINAL_-PETITION Nq. 122ee o-f !Q1 5
ORDER:
Lcarncd counscl for the pctitioncr sr-rbmitst.hat the cause in this petition does not sttr,,'ivc lor further adjudication and it has becomc infructttot-ts
dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous pctitions, pcnding if an1,, shall stand
closcd.
//TRUE COPYII
Sd/-N,CHANDRASEKHARRAO ASSISTANT REGIS,TRAR SECTI tk,..*
To
1 The Xll Additional Chief MetropolitanlVagistrate, at Hyderabad' 2 The Station House Officer,Cehtral Crime Police Station, Hyderabad' J Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor,High Court for the Stateof Telangana, Hyderabad(OUT) 4. Oire CC to Sri T.PradyumnaKumar Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD Copies o,{6. One Spare Copy
J
HIGH COURT
D ATED:08107 12022
<br>tts ruq nI
ORDER
CRLP.No.12299 of 2015
DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS. L
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is maintainable in the given circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ch. Narasimha Reddy
The State of Telangana
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
