Dismissed

Mahboob Bee (A-2), Jeedimetla and Anr., v. Mehmooda Begum, Sec-Bad and Anr, Rep Pp.

Telangana HC10 Feb 2022CRLP/11197/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted permission for petitioners to withdraw their criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings. Consequently, the criminal petition file No. 11197 of 2013 was dismissed and incidental matters were closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the criminal petition; petition dismissed.

Mahboob Bee (A-2), Jeedimetla and Anr., Vs Mehmooda… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL P ETI TION NO: 11197 OF 2013

¶7

Between

¶8

Mahboob Bee, Wio. l,4d.Ali,

¶9

Md,Ati

¶10

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 & 3

¶11

AND

¶12

Mehmooda Begum, W/o. Mohd. N,4ahboob,

¶13

The State of Telangana, rept. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State offelangana at Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONOENT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to quash the proceedings against the^petitioners in C.C.No. 207 of 2012 on the file of the Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

¶16

CRLPMP. NO: 10060 OF 2013

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the l,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay of all further^proceedings including the. appearance of the^petitioners in C.C.No. 207 ot 2012 on the file of the Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad,^pending disposal of the^{quashing petition} before this Hon'ble High Court,

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Smt^D.Sangeetha Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.z and of not appeared either in^person or by advocate^for Respondent No. 1.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITTON No. I tl97 of 2Ot3

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This is a Petition filed under Section 4g2 Cr.p.C. seeking the Court to quash the prbceedings that are pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.207 of 2072 on the file of the Court of VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdrar,r' the Criminai petil ion.

¶25

Permisstor.r is acr:orcl,-cl. 'l'he CriminrLi peuLron is clismisse cl :rs rlit].rrlra.,r n.

¶26

Pending N,l isce11an eo u s Petitions, if an-r'. shail stand

¶27

closed.

¶28

¶29

Sd/-T,KRISHNA KU[/AR //rRUE coPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p,/ SECTION OFFICER

¶30

¶31

l. Ihe Yl^{Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge,Nampatty, Hyderabad.} 2. The Station House Officer, Thukaramgate Police Station; Thukaramgate, Secunderabad.

¶32

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. One CC to Smt D.Sangeetha Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD Copies 6. One Spare Copy Kj. V

HIGH COURT

DATED:1010212022

ORDER

CRLP.No.11197 of 2013

¶37

DISMISSING THE CRL.P

¶38

/. E sI^r€)
,/,o
25 FEA 2U2
6
iu(
2D)).-

Mahboob Bee (A-2), Jeedimetla and Anr., v. Mehmooda Begum, Sec-Bad and Anr, Rep Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahboob Bee (A-2), Jeedimetla and Anr., v. Mehmooda Begum, Sec-Bad and Anr, Rep Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Ghouse Nakshabandi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dr.Nb.Ramaiah Vs Kaushal Kishore and Another

T.Karunaka Raju Vs the State of Ap., Rep by Its P.P and 3 Others

B.Tirumalesh Vs the State of a.P., Rep. by Its Inspector of Police

Thoutam Sukendranath Vs the State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp and Another

Chikoti Rama and Another Vs the State of Ap., and Another