Abdullah v. Mohammed
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court appellate court dismissed a civil appeal for non-prosecution. The bench found the appellant negligent, delaying proceedings repeatedly without sufficient cause. A pending interim stay was vacated.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution without costs; interim stay vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
clry clvlL COURT APPEAL NO: 105 OF 2015
Appeal under section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dt.9-4-2015in OS N. 1979 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Vll Senior Civil Judge,CityCivil Court,Hyderabad
Betwee n
Abdullah, S/o Late Md. Abdul Rasool, aged about52 years, R/o H No.1 8-1-397' Tadlakunta, Keshavgiri, Chandrayanaptta Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT (DEFENDANT No.1)
AND
- Mohammed, S/o Late Mohd. Abdul Rasool,Fl/oH.No., 18-1-397Tadlakunta, Keshavgiri, Chbndrayarnagutta Hyderabad.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's negligence and lack of representation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Abdullah
- respondent
Mohammed
- respondent
Khairunnisa
- respondent
Fatimunnisa
- respondent
Bilquees Jahan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CCCA/105/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court