In this contempt case, the petitioner withdrew the proceedings to avoid punishment. The High Court recorded the withdrawal and closed the contempt case without awarding costs.
Contempt Case No. 1580 of 2021 is closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1580 OF 2021
Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for, wilful disobedience of the Order of the High Court dated 1711212020 Passed in W.P.No. 17663 of 2O2O .
Betrveen:
K. Satyanarayana Reddy, aged about 59 years, by faith - Hindu, by nationality - lndian, r/o H No. 8-7-1 14 I 10 I 32 and 33, Hussaini Bagh, Gooll Boli, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad, Telengana, PIN -50001 1.
...PETITIONER
AND
...CONTEMNORS/RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. SHRADDHA GUPTA
Counsel fortheRespondents:GP FORHoME (TG)
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
I l
I
I
I-IoN'BLE SRI JUSTICD I'. NAVtrtrN RAO
CONTtrMm CASE No 1580 ot 2O2 I
ORAL ORDER:
Ms. Smriti Jaiswal, representing learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt case.
Recording the same, contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous
petitions, if any pending, are closed.
\
SD/-CH.VEN KATESWARU LU JOINT REGISTRAR 1'
//TRUE COPY' t-'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
CD
'N>
HIGH COURT
DATED:221(t712022
ORDER
CC.No.15li0 of 2021
e
O
1$ g STA.IC-;..,. ^N
7\
:i ll
2s sEP frIIl oll
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE NO COSTS.
\dP: t"1 I
K. Satyanarayana Reddy
State of Telangana through Deputy Commissioner of Police (North Zone)
Mr. K. Ravi Kumar
P Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
