The appeal filed by APSEB officials against an order of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam came up for hearing. None of the appellants appeared or made any representation. The single judge dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution and directed closure of miscellaneous applications.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL .TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 3 246 0F 2004
Appeal under Section 96 Riw. 41 Rule 1 cpc against the order of the court of the senior civil Judge, Khammam in oS No.1 55 of 1 997, dated 07 lo}l2oo2
Between:
...PET|T|oNERS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4
AND
(Respondent No.6 not necessary party in this appeal)
*"'*oJ.orBnl8liitit'JFE-JISrg
ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing, and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order of the Lower court and the materiar papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri J.Siddiah, Advocate for the appelant and of sri M.V.Rao, Advocate (not present) for the Respondent Nos.1 , 2, 3, & 4.
The Court delivered the following Judgment:_
\
I-ION'BLE SN,IT JUSTI CENI.G.PRIYADARSINI
A.S.N 0.3246 0I: 2001
NT:
On 21 .04.2022,r,or,e appearedand no representadon
was made on behalf of theappellants.On 26.04.2022 also,
none appeared and therewas no rcpresentadonon behalI of the appellants. Hence,the matter was directed to bc listed under thc capdon"for dismissai".'fodav' when thc mattcr is taken up for hearing,noneaPpearsand no re Prescntatlo l-I ls made on behalf of tl-re appellants.It seemsthc appellantsarc
not interestcdu-r pursui.ngLbc matter.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissedfor non-prosecutlon
No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, ifany, pending, shall stand
closed
Sd/-K.SRINIVASARAO JOINT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYi/ qD
SECTION OFFICER
To
a
HIGH COURT
DAfED:.2810412022
1 6E SIA r.c:
2(
co 13 JUL 202 t o
t
cEs i:ATC
JUDGMENT
AS.No.3246 of 2004
DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION.
o
Superintendent Engineer, APSEB (Aps TRANSCO) Northern power Distribution Co.
Additionar Engineer, ApsEB (Ap TRANSCO) Northern power company
Divisionar Engineer, ApsEB (Ap TRANSCO) Northern power company
Chariman, Ap-SEB, Vidyut, Soudha
Smt.Pujalla Lachamma
Pujatta Inhumayapatem
M.G. Priyadarsini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
