The High Court of Telangana dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on account of a settlement between the parties outside the Court without awarding costs.
The appeal suit was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3216 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN
FIRST APPEAL NO: 216 OF 20'17
to allow the appeal, with costs, setting aside thejudgment and Decree dated: 23-12-20'16 in O.S.No. 4 of 2014 passed by the court of Vll Additional District Judge at Bodhan, Nizamabad District, in the interest ofjustice and to pass
Between:
..APPELLANTS/PLAINTI FFS
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRl. DAMODAR RAO ADVOCATE
Counsel for the Respondents: K DEVENDER ADVOCATE
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
I
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEM. LAXMAN
APPEAL SUIT No.216OF 2OL7
JUDGMENT:
3 Recording the same,the Appeal Suit is dismissedas
withdrawn.No orderas to costs.
SD/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY// seiri6uoFFlcER
To,
5.One SPare
\lY
HIGH COURT
DATED:1111012022
ORDER
AS.No.216 of 2017
? IAr
ry
o
oa,J 1[ Nrt! ZUII
(_:
r< D E s
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS
WITHDRAWN WITIIOUT COSTS
Nannapaneni Rama Rao
Nannapaneni Shiva Prasad
Smt. Nannapaneni Soubhagyamma
Smt. Sadhana
M. Laxman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
