The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition (Public Interest Litigation) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India because the petitioner failed to appear before the court on the date fixed for arguments, despite prior notice for dismissal.
No order passed; the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRASHARMA AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION(PlL) NO: 2 OF 2018
Between:
K.Eshwaraiah, S/o. Kotala Veeraiah, aged about65 years,Occ-Agriculture,Fl/o. Sy.No. 787, Raigiri, Bhongir District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the HighCourt may be pleasedto pass an Order or Direction or Writ,particularly one in theNature ofWrit of Mandamus directing the Respondent1 to4 to take steps to protect the natural resources and ecology in Raigiri village, BhongirMandal, Bhongir - Yadadri District and further directing all the respondents torestrainfrom demolition,drillingor Causing ecological imbalances including demarcationor illegal layout and plots of land in about 350 Acres in Sy.No.7SB to 801etc. of Raigiri Village, BhongirMandal, Bhongir - Yadadri Dist.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleased to grant lnterim Staypending disposal of the Writ Petitionrestrainingthe 6th Respondent, tvl/s. lncredible lndia Projects Pvt.Ltd., from demolition, drillingor causing any illegal layout and Plot of land in about 350 Acres in Sy.No. 758 to 801 etc of Raigiri Village, Bhongir Mandal, Bhongir- Yadadri Dist.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. AKELLASREENIVAS RAO (NOT PRESENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3: GP FORPANCHAYAT RAJ& RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 & 5: GPFORSTAMPS& REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 6: NONEAPPEARED
The Court made the following:
\
THE HON'B: ,E THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDTU S,HARMA
AND
T IE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJ'I
WRIT PETITION IPILI No.2 of 2018
ORDER: eet tl ) I lotr'ble the Chef Justtce Satlsh(,'handro .>-/irrrnraT
There i,as no appearance on behall of th.e F)etitioner on 23.11.2(21. The matter was therelore directed to be Iisted today under the caption "for dismissal" Today the matter is a1 rpearing under the said caption. In spite of the same, there is no appearance on be.half of the petitioner.
The w: it petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution The miscellaneous applications pending in this writ pe ition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. V.SUDHA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
/iTRUE COPY// '.-- -
SECTION OFFICER
To,
PM
LS
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611212021
ORDER
WP(PlL).No.2 of20'18
.i<br>6c',e
It.>
1 '! JAfl 2!12
Dismissing the WP(PIL) Without costs,
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 226 can be maintained in the absence of the petitioner.
K. Eshwaraiah
The State of Telangana
The Collector, Bhongir - Yadgiri Dist.
The District Panchayat Officer, Bhongir Yadgiri Dist
The Chairman, Yadadri Temple Development Authority
M/s. Incredible India Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Satish Chandra Sharma
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
