Dismissed
Sri.Md.Khadar Pasha v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/7969/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE…
What the court decided
AI extract
DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 7969 OF 2021
Between:
Sri Md. Khadar Pasha, S/o. Shaik Latheef Aged about 61years, Occ.Gazetted Head Master Gr-ll (Retired) ZPHS-Datharpally, Yadagiriguttafi/andal, Yadadri- Bhongir District R/o. Plot No. 52, Jahangir Nagar colony,Besidelt4asjid-EJirdoz Chinthal Kunta, LB. Nagar, Hyderabad-500074. TelanganaState.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'.NDENT'
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleasedto issue an order or direction or a writ moreparticularlyone in the natureof writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the3rd respondentin awarding punishment of stoppage of two Annual Grade lncrementswith cumulativeeffect as per Rule 9 (iv) of ccA Rules 1991 without issuing ashowcause notice awarding major penalty as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory,unjust and against Rule 9 (iv) of ccA Rules 1991, thelaw laid downby the Honble courts and in violation of Articles 14,.16 and 21 of the constitution oflndia and hold that the petitioner may be awarded minor penalty asper rule 9(iv) ofCCA Rules 1991 instead of stoppage of Two Annual Grade lncrements with cumulativeeffect and consequential benefits.
IANO: 1OF2 021
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High court maybe pleased to directthe 3rd and 5th respondents to take actionas per rule 9 (iv) of ccA Rules 1991 pending disposal of the above writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRIP. LAXMA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1to 4: GPFOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.S:SRI NARASIMHA SHARMA, SC FOR AG
The Court made the following:OROER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI
WRIT PETITI ON No.7969 ol 2021
ORDER:
Leorned counsel oppeoring for thepetitionerrequests the Court topermit thepetitioner towiihdrowthis writ pelitionwith o liberty toprefer on oppeol.
ln view of the obove submission,the writ petilion is dismissed
os withdrown bygiving libertyos proyed for. No costs.
Pending miscelloneouspeliiions,if ony, sholl stond closed.
SD/.K.SAILESHI
//TRUE COPY//
ASSISTANT REGIS}RAR trr---
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SII'I
\ ;--
HIGH COURT
DATED:01/04/202'l
HE sIA I4: oA
,t
c:)
O 0lunffitl O
-t.
*
.a'
o5.,-.'.1ct
ORDER
WP.No.7969 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
\uJ s ,,
Md. Khadar Pasha
The State of Telangana
The Director of School Education
The Rigidional-Joint Director of School Education
The District Educational Officer
The Principal accountant General (A and E)
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court