Dismissed
Esampelli Ravindar v. State of Telangana and 3 others
Telangana HCWP/783/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 783 OF 2021
Between:
Esampelli Ravindar, S/o Rajaram, Aged 49 years, R/o 11-169, Kamalapur Post and Mandal Warangal Urban, Telangana,505102.
...PET|T|ONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleasedto issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing thepetitioner for verificationof documenls for admission into 3(three)years Law Coursepursuant topassing in T.S. Lawcet, 2020 conducted by the respondents under thepremise thatpetitioner failed to secure 40% marks and thepetitioner secured only39.3'1 %in the qualifying degree examination, though thepetitioner is eligible for admissioninto three years Law degree course in terms of Rules, as illegal and arbitrary and contrary to thesaid Rule and consequently direct the respondents to accept thepetittonereducational certificates and give admission to thepetitioner into 3(three) years law course as per merit pursuant to passing in T.SLawcet,2020 examination.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 15'1 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleased to directthe respondents to accept thepetitioners certificate forqualifying degree examinationand altot him a seat in 3(three) years Law degreecourse, pursuantto his passingin T.S.Lawcet, 2020 examination in accordancewithRule7 0f Bar councilof lndia Rules, 2008,pending disposal of theWrit Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.MUDDANA KOTESWARA RAO
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1to 3: GPFOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Counsel for the RespondentNo.4: SRl. CH. JAGANNADHARAO, SC FOR OU
The Court made the following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.783 of 2021
ORDER:
Leorned counsel oppeoring for the petitioner requests the court to permit the peiitioner to withdrow this writ petition with o
liberty to file fresh writ petiilon, if necessory.
Permission is gronted qnd the writ petition is occordingly dismissed os withdrown by gronting liberty os proyed for. No order os to costs.
Miscelloneous petitions, if ony, pending, sholl stond closed.
To,
SD/- K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// ,(s-.
SECTION OFFICER
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10212021
ORDER
1
-r H c
,4 ,4:
oo 15 tEB 2021
p
*
D
W.P.No.783 o12021
D!SMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
b
az {t"rf
Esampelli Ravindar
State of Telangana
The Convenor, Telangana Lawcet, 2020 Osmania University
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court