Dismissed

Smt.G. Sangeetha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Apr 2021WP/5554/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed seeking direction to police to register a crime and take action under Articles 226 and 151 CPC. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition after the police registered a case. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Smt.G. Sangeetha Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI{A AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶5

WR IT PETITION NO: 5554 0F 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Lqrl^{Gr Sqngeelh.a,W/o.NageswaraRao,Aged about 33 years, Occ: House Wife,} H.No.2-4-328, B.N.Reddy Nagar, Chedapaily, Hyderabad.

¶8

...PET|T|ONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Represented by it Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

¶11

The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda.

¶12

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, IValkajigiri Zone, I/edchal-tMalkajigiri District.

¶13

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kusaiguda, Medchal-tt/alkajigiri District.

¶14

The Station House Officer, P.S. Kushaiguda, I\rledchal- Malkajigirl District. 6 pmt Ramavath Soujanya, W/o. Kotyan-yak, Aged about 34 years, Occ.House Wife, Rio.H.No .11-12156, Lane No.3, Venkatreddy Colony, N'agaram, Keesara Ir,4andal, tvledchal-lr,4alkajigiri District.

¶15

Ramavath Kotyanayak, S/o. Not Known, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Scientific Assistant(D), NFC, R/o. H. No .1 1 -121 56, Lane No.3, Venkatreddy Colony, Nagaram, Keesara Mandal, tvledcha l-lr/a lkajig iri District.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or writs order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAIVUS declaring inaction of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in not taking any action on complaint daled 1510212021 which is made by the petitioner and not registering the Crime is as illegal arbitrary and violation of the article 19,21 of Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to 4 to take action on Complaint dated 1510212021 , forthwith in the interest of^justice and equity. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to 4 to take action on Complaint dated 1510212021 made by the petitioner and register the crime, forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KALVALA SANJEEV

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR^HOME

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 &^{7: NONEAPPEARED}

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN}

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.5554^{AF 2O2L}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Sri K,Sanjeer,, learned^{counseL lor thc pctitioner,n'outld submit} that on liling of the rvrit^{petilion, lhc Police havcre gis:ere d a case in} Crime No.l79 of 2021.^{In vier,v ol the samc, he seeks permission of lhrs} ( oulL'o u. ithdrar,r' Ihc prescnt u rir peLirioll.

¶26

Permission is accorded.

¶27

Accordingly, the writ petition^{is dismissed as r'vithdralvnNo}

¶28

costs.

¶29

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{pending if any, shall stand dismissedin}

¶30

the li ht of this final ord^e

¶31

SD/. K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G" //TRUE COPY//

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To, 1. One CC to Sri^{Kalvala Sanjeev, Advocate} [OPUC] -Op for Uome, gigfr Court for the Stat-e of Telangana at Hyderabad. ). l;; CCsio touTl

¶34

Two CD Copies CHR

1--

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210412021

ORDER

W.P.No.S554 o12021

a
v
*
t'L'
,.1 ,i
\d/Y-\ d,5,rg
o^.

¶42

DISMISSING THE WRIT^PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS-

¶43

fu,a , ?", 6

Smt.G. Sangeetha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.G. Sangeetha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Zakir Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana

Abdul Azher Vs The State of Telangana

Mupparapu Ngaraju Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Sri. Shivaratri Kumaraswamy Vs The State of Telangana, And Another

Thatiparthi Mohan Rao and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Mohammed Irfan Mohiuddin Vs The State of Telangana