Dismissed

N. Venkata Subba Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Telangana HC28 Apr 2021WP/4840/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 151 CPC, dismissing them as withdrawn without costs and declaring pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petitions; petitions dismissed as withdrawn without costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

N. Venkata Subba Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 2… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH^{DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN^RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 4840 OF 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

N. Venkata Subba Reddy, S/o. Late.^{VenkatReddy,Agqd about} 13^ygap, . ^ ... R/o. Ptot No. 4, Sri Canedn Nilayam,^{Venkat Ramaiah. Colony,il,4edchal(V & M),} Malkajigiri District^(Old RR District),^{TelanganaState.}

¶8

...PET|TIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Represented^{by its Principal Secre1ary, Roads and} Buildinos Deoartm5nt. Secretariat, Hyderabad,^{TelanganaState.}

¶11

The Su"perint'end ing Engineer^{(R & B), N.H. Circle, Erramaniil,ENC Office.}

¶12

Hvderabad. Telanqana State.

¶13

J. i6e Execuiive En{ineer^(R &^{B), N.H. Division, at Kalwakurthy, Nagarkurnool} District, Telangana. state

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of^{the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavit filed therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto} issue a wnt or order or direction^{more particularly one in the nature of Writ of} l,4andamus declaring that the action^{of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in interfering with} the petitioners land admeasuring^{Ac.2.10gts in Sy. No.216 and 219 situated at} Bechirag Madharam of Suryapet^{Mandaland District as bad, arbitrary, illegal and} consequently direct the^{respondentsnot to interferewith the above said petitioners} land.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶17

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High court maybe pleased to directthe} respondents not to interfere the^{petitioners position of the landadmeasuring Ac. 2.'10} gts in Sy. No.216 and 219 situated at Bechirag^{Madharam of suryapetMandal and} D istrict.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRl.P. VENKATESWAR RAO}

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents:^{AGPFORROADS BUILDINGS}

¶20

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶21

¶22

THE HON,BLE^{SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO}

¶23

WRIT PETITION^{No. 4A400F 2020}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned counsel^{for the petitioner filed aletter dated} 25.03.2O2 1 seckirrg^{pcrmissionof the Court to u'ithdraw the u'rit} pL't1t1o n

¶26

Permission is^{accorded and the u'rit petition is dismissed as}

¶27

ivirhdran'n. Miscellaneous^{petitions, if any, pending,stand closed'}

¶28

SDII,NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT^REGISTBAR \_.-. //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

¶30

To,

¶31

One CC to^{Sri P. Venkateswar Rao' Advocate[OPUCI} 2 rwo cCs to^{GP to, no,ll"l'ilii;iiai"s;'iish bourtf6r the stateof Telansana} at Hvderabad. [OUT]

¶32

Two'CD^CoPies

CHR

HIGH^COURT

DATED:2810412021

ORDER

W.P.No.4840 of²⁰²⁰

E STA 14:
(
.t ($-(_.
c
i') 0 7 JUll?fl t-r
.a-
*

¶39

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶40

5 -J
al
2

N. Venkata Subba Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N. Venkata Subba Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manimaddi Komuraiah Vs Manimaddi Buchaiah

Palla Nagi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Emmadi Someshwer Vs The Special Tribunal at Mahabubabad

Sri Meda Venkata Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Mohd. Islamuddin Ansari Vs The State of Telangana

Yasa Venkatram Narsaiah, Vs The Stale of Telangana