Dismissed

Hazari Madan Mohan v. The State of Telangana and

Telangana HC11 Feb 2021WP/422/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana considered a writ petition and an accompanying miscellaneous petition for interim relief. The petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the matter elsewhere. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Hazari Madan Mohan Vs The State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 422 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Hazari tvladan Mohan, S/o late Sri. Ganga Ram,^{Age 66 Years, Occ.Business,} RJo H No. 4-70-814, Venkateshwar Colony, Armoor Proper,^{NizamabadDistrict,} Telangana -503224.

¶9

2 Smt. Flazari Swaroopa,, W/o late Sri.^{HazariAshok, aliasHazari AshokKumar,} Age 48 Yrs, Occ. Household, R/o H No 3-2-62,^{Gandhi Road, Armoor,} Nizamabad District, Telang ana-503224.

¶10

...pETt,oNERS

¶11

AND

¶12

'1 . The State of Telangana and, rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Registration and Stamps, Secretaria-t Building, Burgula Rama^{KrishnaRaoBhavan, NH 44' Hill} Fod, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad, TS^-500063

¶13

Commissioner and lnspector General, Registration^{and Stamps5-9:q5-3-,}

¶14

Registration Bhavan Nizam Shahi Road,^{MJ Market, Hyderabad - 5-00001..-}

¶15

Dislrict Registrar of Assurances and^{lMarriage Officer, Nizamabad District, Kumar} Galli, Nizamabad, Telangana^-503003.

¶16

Sub- Registrar Armoor, Sub- Registrar Olfice,l'2-5814,^{NearOld SBH Bank'} Armoor, Nizamabad District, Telangana⁵⁰³²²⁴

¶17

Javidi Gangareddy, S/o Late Gangareddy,^{Aged about 64 Years, Occ.Business,} H No 2-1 1B-, Pedd'apur Village, Korutla^{tvia nd-alpresently underlVletpalli lvlandal,} Jagtiyal District, Telangana^- 505325.

¶18

Va-naparthi Chandra Mbhan, S/o^{lateRajaiah,Age about 47 years, Occ.} Business, R/o H No. 3-3-101, Partel^{Road, KorutlaTown, Jagtiyal Telangana-} 505325

¶19

Kommula Venkanna, S/o late Venkata^{Narsaiah, Aged about 63 Years, Occ.} Business, R/o H No. 5-108/1 , Choutpalli^{Village, KammarpallilVlandal,} Nizamabad District, Telanqana 503308,

¶20

B. Kottala Raieshwar, S/o lat6^{Raiaram, Aged about 5'l Years' Occ.Agriculture,R/o} H No. 4-2811 , Choutpalli Village, Kammarpalli^{lvlandal,Nizamabad District,} Telangana -503308.

¶21

Baddim Rajeshwar, S/o late^{Rajanna, Aged.about 41 years'.Occ.Busjness,R/o} H No. 6-61, Choutpalli Village, Kammarpalli^{l,4andal' NizamabadDistrict'} Telangana- 503388.

¶22

10.1r/ohairmed Arbaz Ahmed, S/o Mohammed^{llyas, Age 25 Yeat,Occ Student,R/o} H No. 4-1-'1 7511 , Ir/uthyalwada, Korutla^{Town and Mandal, Jagtiyal District'} Telangana- 505325.

¶23

1 1 . Singir6ddi Rajeshwar, S/o^{late Narsimlu, Age 65 Years, Occ Business, RI/o H No.} 1-65/4, Donkal Village, Morthad^{Mandal, NizamabadDistrict,Telangana-} 503311.

¶24

12.Maru Shankar, S/o Linganna,^{Aged about 53 Years, Occ.Business, R/o H No' 6-} 31 , Choutpalli Village,^{Rammarp=alli Mandal, Nizamabad District' Telangana-} 5o33BB

¶25

...RE.P.NDENTS

¶26

Petition under Article 226 of the^{constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be pleased} to issue a writ or order^{more particularlyin the nature of writ of Mandamus} declaring the action of the^{4th respondentin issuing impugned letter dt. 2111212020} in File No. 12B|2O2O as illegal,^{arbitrary and set asidethe same and further direct} the official respondents to^{considerthe representationdt. 2111212020ot the} Petitioners

¶27

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶28

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction, directing the 4th respondent to not to entertain any kind of transaction or registration of any document in respect of Plots in L.P No. 22l93lHRO of Sy No. 44011 A to Ru, Nizamabad Road, Armoor Village, Nizamabad District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI LAKSHMI KANTH

¶29

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for Respondent Nos. 5 to 12: SRI MOHD. MOIN AHMED QUADRI

¶30

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶31

THE HON'BLE SRI^{JUSTICE T' AMARNATHGOUD}

¶32

WRIT PETITION^{No.422OF 2O21}

¶33

ORDERT

¶34

When the matter^{is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for} the petitioners^{seekspermission of the Court to withdrawthe Writ} Petition with a^{liberty to pursue the matter before the appropriate} form.

¶35

Permission is^{accorded to withdraw the writ petition' It is} needless to observe^{that there is no need to grant permissionto} pursue the matter^{beforethe appropriate form'}

¶36

3 Accordingly, this^{Writ Petitionis dismissedas withdrawn'}

¶37

There shall be^{no order as to costs'}

¶38

Miscellaneous^{petitions,if any, shall also stand closed'}

¶39

SD/.K,SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 4o ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶40

To'1. One CC to Sri Lakshmi Kanth Advocate tOPUql. .

¶41

i. i;; ddri" ci^{Fo; Sta;;;AndResistr'ation,Hish courtfor the State of} Telangana. [OUT] s. o;ie ic to Sri^{lr,rcino. MoinAhmed Quadri, Advocate(oPUC)}

¶42

Two CD Copies

MBC <

Af"-/

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1110212021

1 H e s TA 14:
oc 2 2 F E B 202r z
* I
Drrl,'
,:.

¶48

ORDER

¶49

WP.No.422 ot 2021

¶50

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,

¶51

WITHOUT COSTS

¶52

C:V C. coQ^{r e4} l"oV-Y'

Hazari Madan Mohan v. The State of Telangana and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hazari Madan Mohan v. The State of Telangana and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Abdul Ghani Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Mumtaz Ali Vs State of Telangana

Krishna Prasad Sadhu Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

M. Mani Vs The Stale of Telangana

T. Rajender Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Goguri Dileep Vs The State of Teiangana and 3 others