Dismissed
Rolla Srinivasa Rao , Pappu v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/2933/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2933 0F 2021
Between:
B^:[l,9l"jlq:f T3q @ l3pqr, $/9. Gyi1v1qh, aged ab-out 45 years, Member of retusu uuborng Artists union with card No.207, R/o. Victory Enclavel plot No.22, Motinagar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry me in the nature of writ of ['4andamus, decraring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not adjudicating the matter basing on the compromtse memo tiled by the petitioner and the sth respondent in the capacity of the 4th respondent and the action of the 5th respondent in the capacity of the 4th respondent in proceeding with the conduction of erections to the 4th respondent organization without waiting for the adjudication of the 2nd respondent in the matter and terminating my membership is as iregar. arbitrary and contrary to the Fundamental Rights enshrined under the constitution of lndia and consequentry direct the respondent to adjudicate the matter as earry as possibre and direct the 5th respondent in the capacity of the 4th respondent not to conduct the erections untir the adjudication or the matter by the 2nd respondent in the matter.
/
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to adjudicatethe matter as earlyas possible and directthe sth respondent in the capacityof the 4th respondentnot to conductthe elections until the adjudication of thematterby the 2nd respondentin the matter or in the alternative direct thesth respondentin the capacityof the 4th respondentto allow thepetitioner inparticipating in the election process to the 3rd respondenls organization which aregoing to be held on or after 14.02.2021, pending disposalof the main Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section151 cPC prayingthat in the clrcumstancesstated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner tofile the copiesof Election Noticedt. 2810112021 issuedby theSth respondentinthecapacityofthe4threspondentandtheMembershipldentityCard ofthePetitioneraSadditionalmaterialpaperstothemainWritPetitionforproper adjudicationof the matter, in the interest of justice'
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRI N' V' R' AMARNATH
Counsel forthe RespondentNos'1 & 2: GPFOR LABOUR
Counselfor the RespondentNos' 3 to 5: -
The Courtmadethe following:ORDER
(
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION No.2933 OF 2O21
ORDER:
No order as lo costs. Misceilaneous petitions, if any, shall also
stand dismissed
SD/-K.ONESIM
ASSISTANT REGIS ,TRUE COPY'
SECTION FFICER
To, 1. One CC to SriN. V. R. Amarnath, Advocate [OPUC] ). i;; CCdlJep forLabour, Hrgn'Court for the Stat6 of Telanganaat Hyderabad. lourl 3. Two CD Copies.
l,,1P
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010212021
ORDER
1S
1 HL TA Ie :i
o 20 tEB 2021 oz
WP.No.2933 ot 2021
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITIONAS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
7
/o
{
B. Narasimha Reddy
The State of Telangana
The Joint Commissioner of Labour
The A.P. Film Industry Employees Federation
Telugu Movie Dubbing Artists Union
Y. Suresh Babu
T. AMARNATH GOUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court