Writ petition challenging disqualification as a director is disposed of as the disqualification period was completed and Director Identification Number became active, rendering the petition infructuous.
Disposal of the writ petition with no further orders and no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 29305 OF 2021
Betwee n:
Smt Regina Mary, W/o Late Robert Francis, Aged about. 50years, R/o 208, Minar Apartments, Deccan Towers, Basheerbagh, Nampally, Hyderabad, G.P, Telanqana State-500001
...pETrroNER
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to pass an order or direction or any otherproceedings one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in disqualifying thepetitioners as a directors and deactivating the petitioner Director ldentification Number(DlN) 01887746 and restricting thepetitioner to incorporate new companies Under Companies Act. 2013 as arbitrary, illegal, withoutjurisdiction, contrary of the provisions of the Companies Act, 201 3 and Rule .1 1 of the Companies (Appointment of Directors) Rules, 2014, violative of the principles of naturaljustice besides violating the petitioner rights guaranteed under Article1 4 and Article1 9(1 ) (g) of the Constitution of lndia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the l st Respondent to stay the disqualification and restore the petitioner Director ldentification Number (DlN) 01887746 the petitioner so as to enable thepetitioner to incorporate new companies Under Companies Act, 2013.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. G. SUMATHI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. KRISHNA SWAMY, FOR
SRI NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, ASST.SOLICITOR GENERAL
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HO]\ ]URABLE SRI .]TISTICE B. /IJAYSIIN }t|l-DDY
W,P.No.29305 0F 202 I
ORDER:
Mr.R.K ishna Swamy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the learned As istant Solicitor General of India submits that the prayer in the writ pe ition has become infructuous, as the disqualification period was con pleted and DIN has been made active as on this date. 2. Recordir 3 the same and taking on record the hard copy of e-mail instructi rns dated 07.12,2021 received by the respondents, the writ petition i disposed of as no further orders are necessary. No costs.
J Pending r riscellaneous petirions, ifany, shall stand closed.
SD/. MOHD.SA NAIJLLAH ANSARI ASSISiTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SEC:TION OFFICER
"^{ SW
HIGH COURT
DATED 2211212021
ORDER
WP.No.29305 ol 2021
I
lt
DISPOSING OF THE W) WITHOUT COSTS
I 0
Smt Regina Mary
Union of India
The Registrar of Companies (For State of Telangana)
B. Vijayya Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
