Dismissed
Chitta Amrutha v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/26918/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE.OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAD(Speciat…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE.OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAD(Speciat…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE.OF TELANGANA AT I{YDERABAD. -. (Speciat Originat .trri"OiJtioni
WEDNESDAy, THE TWENTY SECoND DAY oF SEPTEI,BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Between:
WRIT P ETI TION N O: 2691 oF 2017
chitta Amrutha' D/o' chitta llj?!9y" slsJrv^,^4g9d about s3 yearc, No.1221, wesr 3rd street, Apartment No.423 Los-Ang.]es, cn iiooiT-riiiesented by her GpA Horder and father sri chitta Anianev, stry-s7o- rai" ,r]ti, vJnr<ateswartd aged about-76-years r/o Btock No. 17, Ftit s,'rr,lrcji. a'ashir;;;p;ii;,;ryd";'raoao _ 500 044
AND
...PET|T|oNER
Petition under Articre 226 or the constitution of rndia ,;;fr:rtiflili:11: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 in not allotting house flats at sampoornam (HlG)flats under Venture Ill, phase-XV, at KpHB colony on First-cum-First serve Basis in respect of 180 completed flats under Blocks 2 & 3 as per the list consisting of 184 applicants, (while ignoring 4 ineligible applicants) treating the same as one unit and the drawl of lots conducted on 23.09.2015 and 30.09.2015 as bad, arbitrary, illegal, and discriminatory and offends Article 14 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia, besides contrary to its regulations and notifications and consequently to direct the respondents 2 & 3 to allot'180 flats in favour of 180 eligible applicants including petitioners as per the Iist prepared and supplied through proceedings dated 03.06.2015, treating'180 flats as one unit, duly following Firstcum-First Serve Basis
WPMP. NO: 33442 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of Lr.No.352/'1 1/1400sft/Ph-XV/Ven-lll/EE[WD/ KKPI2017 dated: 1.8.2017 of the 3rd respondent herein, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V.V.N. NARASIMHAM
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR HOUSING
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI C. BUCHI REDDY
(SC FOR THB & TSHCL)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THEHON'BLE SRI JUSTICET'VINODKUMAR WRIT TIONNo.26918 of 20L7
ORDER
Learnedcounsel tor the petitionersubmits that thec ause in the WritPetitiorLdoesnot surviveany more for considera'tion by this Court.A letter dated 15 09 2021 has been filed seeking permissionto wilhclrawthe Writ Petition'
In view' ol'theletter filed expressingdesire to '''itharaw the Writ Petition, theWrit Petitionis dismissedas withdra"vn No order as toco sls
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.V.SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR &,
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri V.V.N. Narasimham, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri C. Buchi Reddy (SC FOR THB & TSHCL) IOPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. tourl 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy CHR r4-
l
HIGHCOURT
DATED:2210912021
ORDER
L 5 TA r A
1
J
o 2 r ofi?$f,
* O59r,a, "'
W.P.No.26918 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
7
Chitta Amrutha
The State of Telangana
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court