High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging a commercial tax assessment order as infructuous due to subsequent events without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
wRtT PETTT|ON NO. 24574 OF 202p
Between:
Amq Corp, Shop No. 2511252. KandlakoyaVillage,Medchal, MedchalMandal, Hydlrabail 501402, Telangana. Represented byits Partner, Mr. Sunlit RajendraGupta, S/o Mr' Rajendra'
...PETrroNER
...RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction onein the nature of [vlandamusdeclaring the Assessment Order in A.A.O. No.44152,dated2910312020'passed by the'1 st Respondent, for theperiod 20'1 5-16. under theprovisionsof the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, as void, arbitrary, highhanded, mechanical,without jurisdiction and bereft of any valid reasons, apart from beingillegal, violative of principles of natUral Justice and Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution oflndia andconsequentlyset aside the sa me.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstancesstated in the affldavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court maybe pleasedto stay all further proceedings, including any recovery,pursuantto the AssessmentOrder in A.A.O. No. 44152, daled 2910312020,passed by the1st Respondent, for the period 2015 - 16, under theprovisions of the Central SalesTax Act, 1956, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SINGAMSRINIVASARAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GPFORCOMMERCIAL TAXES
The Court made the following: ORDER
,i.II E, TIoNOIJ ITAB L I] SRI .I IJSl.IC I' M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
TTIE I.IONOURAB],E SRI JT]STICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRI'I. Pf-TI'tION No.2.157-l of 2020
ORDIIR : (Per flon'blc Sli iLrsticeM.S. Rarnachandra Rao)
Lean-red counsel 1or petitioner states that the Writ Petitionhas
bccome inl'ructuous in view o1'subsequcnt cvr-rlts.
Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissedas
inll'uctuous. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pcnding, ifany, shall stand
closed.
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI
To,
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Qict SECTION OFFICER
\
t/P
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 103t2021
ORDER
WP.No.245T4 of 2O2O
,_*i
1 H E s TA
I
o 16I'1AB 202t z
.P
i *
i c,]r
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Amq Corp
The Commercial Tax Officer (Assistant Commissioner)
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
The State of Telangana
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
