The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus declaring the rejection of his MBBS admission illegal and requested the return of original certificates. The petition was subsequently withdrawn by the counsel before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M,S,RAMACHANDRA RAO AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO: 22541 OF 2020
Between:
Gopichand Banoth, S/o. l/angilal, age 20 years, Occ: Student, R/o.3-159, Jethya Thanda, Koyagudem, Bhadradri, Khammam District, Telangana-507002
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petitron under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropnate writ, order or direction more particularly one ln the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 4 and 5 in not permitting the petitioner to report the 5th respondent college for admission into MBBS course pursuant to allotment letter dated: 511212020 ending till 1011212020 at 4.00PM as illegal, arbitrary and u ncon stitutiona I and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 6 to return back the All Original Certificates of the petitioner in relation to admission order, custodian certificate dated 16/1 1/2020 issued by the 6rh respondent college.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to permit the petitioner for admission into MBBS course pursuant to allotment letter dated: 511212020, pending disposal of writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. RAMESH REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: SRI NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO,
ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3,5&6: GP FOR MEDICAL, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI A. PRABHAKAR RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
Il o N O L lt,\ liL Is lt LJ L sTI C' l" \ l.s. R,\ ]L'\ (' I I A \ l) ltA lt'\ o
AND
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICET.AMARNATH (;OI.]I)
WRIT PETITION NO.22511 0F 2020
RDER:
(Per Sri Justice M.S. RamachandtaRao)
Learned counsel forthe petitionerseeks to withdrawthis Writ
Petition.
2 Accordingly, theWrit Petition is dismissed as lr'ithdrawn
Pencling tniscellaneouspetitions.if any, in this Writ Petitionshall
also stand disrnissed.No costs.
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT E GIS
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIO OFFICER
\
\ To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/01/2021
ORDER
WP.No.22541 ot 2020
B 1HE S 14 r{.
(o
,e
c
11 JAN 2021
*
i.- -
Dismissing the WP. as withdrawn without costs.
-K
D
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to maintain the writ petition challenging the admission rejection.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gopichand Banoth
Union of India
Directorate General of Health Sciences
State of Telangana
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences
Principal, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
