Disposed

M/s. Terus Disinfectant Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Andhra Bank And Another

Telangana HC11 Aug 2021WP/21337/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana extended the time granted in a previous interlocutory order dated 11.08.2021 in W.P. No. 21337 of 2019 by a further period of two weeks from the date of the order, in the interest of justice.

What did the court decide?

Time granted in the order dated 11.08.2021 in W.P. No. 21337 of 2019 is extended by a period of two weeks from today.

M/s. Terus Disinfectant Solution Pvt. Ltd… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶7

LA.NO.1 0F 202',1

¶8

¶9

WRIT PETITIO N NO:21337 OF 2019

¶10

Between:

¶11

M/s. Terus Disinfectant Solution Pvt. Ltd, 2-8, lndian Airlines Colony, Begumpet, Secunderabad-500003, Rep. by its Managins Director Dr.Gowri A::![Y,TB1.*,pE,,oNER

¶12

AND

¶13

Andhra Bank, SARM Branch, 1st Floor, Andhra Bank Building, Sultan Bazar,^Koti, Hyderabad, Rep by its Authorized officer.

¶14

lViKomatireddyAnathaReddy,S/o.Sathi Reddy,Aged.about62Years,R/o.H.No.3-88/1 Baghameer, Kukatpally, Hyderabad

¶15

Union Bank OF lndia, Repiesented by its Authorized Officer SARM^{Branch'1st Floor} Andhra Bank Building sultan Bazar Koti Hyderabad

¶16

...RES'.NDENTS/RES'oNoENrs

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the^{affidavitfiled} in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend/enlarge the^timegranted in the orders dated 11.08.2021 in W.P.No.21337 of 2019 by TWO weeks^from the^{date of} orders in this lnterlocutory Application.

¶18

This petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^petition and the^{affidavit filed in} support thereof and reading the Order dated 11.08.2021 in W.P.No.2'1337^{of 2019 and upon} hearing the arguments of Sri Tadakanti Sridhar, Counsel for the^petitioner and of Smt.^V. Dyumani, Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 1 and of Sri T. Venkat Reddy, Counsel^for Respondent No. 2, the Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

"Heard the learned counsel for the^petitioner and^{Smt. V.} Dyuman learned

¶20

Standing Counsel for the respondent - Bank.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, time granted in the order dated 1 1.08.2021 in W.P.No.21337 of^{2019 is} extended by a period of two weeks from today.

¶22

The application is accordingly ordered."

¶23

//rRUE copy//

¶24

SdI K. ONESIM

¶25

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6o

¶26

SECTION OFFICER

¶27

To, 1. The Authorized Officer, Andhra Bank, SARM Branch,^'1st Floor, Andhra Bank Building, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad.

¶28

The Authorized Officer, Union Bank OF lndia, SARM Branch 1st Floor Andhra Bank Building Sultan Bazar Koti Hyderabad

¶29

One CC to Sri Tadakanti Sridhar Advocate [OPUC]

¶30

One CC to Smt. V Dyumani Advocate [OPUC]

¶31

One CC to Sri T. Venkat Reddy, Advocate^(OPUC)

¶32

Two CD Copies

¶33

One Spare copy

MBC -,/' (J

HIGH COURT

ARR,J & Dr.SA,J

D,\TED: 2510812021

E SiA 16:
,)
))
2lr AUG202| o

P 4.-i C
ORDER

¶39

|.A.NO.1 0F 2021 IN WRIT PETITIOi\I NO: 21337 OF 2019

¶40

<br>

¶41

EXTENSION OF TIME

M/s. Terus Disinfectant Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Andhra Bank And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Terus Disinfectant Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Andhra Bank And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sneha Singh Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

Bukhari Kishen Rahul Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Amjad Vs The State of Telangana

Shikari Mangamma Vs The Debts Recoery Tribunal-2

M/s Akshitha Green Space Lts and another Vs Recovery officer-I and another

M/s. Sree Divya Industries and another Vs The Ministry of Financial Services and 2 others