The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to register an FIR against respondents 4 and 5. The court held that the cause in the writ petition no longer survived for adjudication.
The respondent No.3 not directed to register FIR; the petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 14330 OF 2021
Between:
Sunnam Venkat, S/o. S.Ramulu, Aged 40 Years, Occupation. Business, R/o. Plot No.30, Road No.'1 , Madhura Nagar, Neredmet, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad-56
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheConstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus Directing Respondent No.3 toregister FIR on Respondents No.4 to 5 based on the comptaint ofpetitioner AcknowledgementNo.HYD/TMLG/010621/00539,dated 11612021 .
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the Highcourtmay be pleasedto Direct Respondent No.3 tostart the enquiry againstthe RespondentNo.4 and 5 immediately based on complaintdaled:1t6t2021AcknowledgementNo.HYD/TMLG/ 010621/00539,pendingdisposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. RACHAKONOA RAMAKRISHNA
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1to 3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the RespondentNos.4 & 5: NONEAPPEARED
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
/^l
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSI{MAN
WRIT PETITION No.14330 of2O2l
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, this wlit petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if an_y, pending, shall stand
closed. No costs
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// . ,.-, '-,,,'
SECTIOi,I- OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri Rachakonda Ramakri shna, Advocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP for Home , High Cou rt for the State of Telanlana at Hyderabad. IOUT] 3. Two CD Co pies 4. One Spare copy. CHR
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710912021
ORDER
W.P.No.14330of 2021
1 HE SiA
(
J
o
16 0[T2021 o
-<br>0r: 'iC *
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
lt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication in the given circumstances.
Sunnam Venkat
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad
The Station House Officer, Tirumulgiri
Delta Sakura Motor Corporation
L lml lmational s. Jhabarm-al Pooranmal
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
