Writ petition challenging an arbitrator's order on grounds of illegality and violation of constitutional rights was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner, who stated that a settlement had been reached.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITIO N NO. 14057 0F 2021
Between;
lvl/s.tr/urad Fuel Station, Bharat Petroleum Dealers,PremisesNo.lg-2-26h lA, Sy.No.222, Kandikal Village, Bandlagudalr/andal, Hyderabad, Repres_e_ntedby ita Proprietor lVr Mir il/ohd l/ukram Ali, S/o. lqbalAli, {gedabout 38 years, R/o.H.No.19-2-271A127, Poolbagh, Jahanuma, Hyderabad-5000U4...r=r,r,Or
AND
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleasedto issue, a Writ, Order or Orders moreparticularlyone in the nature Writof Mandamus declaring the impugned orders in ArbitrationCase No.RA/NEO/LRN/LOT-6/64 dated 111512021 passed by the 2nd respondent asillegal, null and void and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the 3rd respondentno to initiate hectic steps to ceasepetitioners movable/immovableproperties/good s with the support of the 1st respondent, by holding theactionof respondents in taking hectic steps to cease thepetitioner movable/immovableproperties in terms of the Arbitration orders dated 11-5-2021 is as illegal, arbitrarydiscriminatoryand violativeof Article 19(1Xg), 20 and 21 of Constitution of lndia besides.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances stated ln the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto suspend the operation of the impugned orders in Arbitration caseNo.RA/NEO/LRN/LOT-6/64 dated 11-5-2021passed by the 2nd respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. JAGANNATHARAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GPFOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 &3: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
I t
Item No.5
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
W.P.N .14057 of 2021
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
the present petition, as afler the filing ofthis petition, the parties have
been able to negotiate an out of court settlement.
pending applications, if any.
SD/.T.TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT R ISTRAR
,TRUE COPY/i
SECTION FICER
To, 'l . One CC to Sri Ch. Jagannatha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. touTl
MP
sab
*-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210712021
ORDER
1ti c TA IC:
(
q
o 15 J$20t1 .ba
*
t
D Es c
WP.No.14057 ot 2021
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS NOT PRESSED,
Yrw
lvl/s.tr/urad Fuel Station, Bharat Petroleum Dealers
Station House Officer, Police Station, Chatrinaka
The Arbitrator, Sri R.B.Agrawal
Neogrowth Credit Pvt Ltd.
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
