Dismissed

Panja gutta Hindu Smashana Vatika Parirakshana Samithi and another v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Telangana HC16 Jun 2021WP/13408/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a writ petition and a miscellaneous petition seeking direction not to damage graves. The Court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a contempt case and dismissed it as withdrawn. The miscellaneous petition was also closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission was accorded to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a contempt case.

Panja gutta Hindu Smashana Vatika Parirakshana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT'?T TELANGANA I?EsJflE€F (Special Originat Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY Or.ri-^'*

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE _ SRIJUSiICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

Between:

¶6

WR|T^pET|TION NO: 13408 OF 2021

¶7

iglil .S_rll,^{Hindu SmashanaVatika parirakshana} Samithi, Regd, Office # B_2_ 272131 t2tA, Shaukath Naqal,. Banjar; Ftiii; H";;"N".i, rivi"iJ#"r;p" tt" Pr:sident P.Anit Kumar S/o;. Chyen;;iah A;;. 5;?;r;,

¶8

2 rvr.>uDasn Ljnander. S/o. Sri ShankaraiJh, Age 37 yrs, Occ. Convener Bajaragadal (VHp WtNG)R/o.H.NO q_s_riz, Vi,ryii ariroi,ig,'xoil,

¶9

..PETITIONERS'vaii"rir"o',

¶10

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Chief Secretarv, Secretariat Hvderaharl z rne state or reranoana, Represented by its princibar secretarv wlni.."r.^{AdministrationANd Urb-an Devetopr";(} d;pr;;5;i5;;;;i;;i'ri'H1;illirlra 3 The Greater Hyderabad rvunicipar'corpoot5n, ,."p uv iri ctrrilJi".L?, ir"r, Bund Hyderabld

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may^"oe pleased to rssue an order, direction particularly one in the nature oiwRlr oF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate order /orders declaring the High handed action of the respondents mainly the 3ro respondent who damaged the several graves contra to their submission before this Hon'ble court and invited reasoned orders in wp(plL) No.67 of 2020 on 231612020 but not acting as per the orders is illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutiona I and violation of natural justice FURTHER direct the respondents not to damage any single grave in Panja gutta Hindu smashana Vatika in laying the road as admitted in the WP(PlL) NO. 67 of 2020

¶14

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to damage any single grave in Panja gutta Hindu Smashana Vatika in laying the road as admitted in the WP(PlL) NO. 67 of 2020 pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G.L.NARASIMHA RAO

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRAT|ON AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

¶19

Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY

¶20

S.C. FOR G.H.M.C.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

,a i

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI^{JUSTICEA.ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶24

WRIT PETITION^N o.^{13408of 2O2L}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

The learned counsel for the^{petitionerseeks permission of} this Court to withdraw the writ^{petition with liberty to take} necessary action for fiiing contempt case against^{the respondents.}

¶27

Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to initiate contempt proceedings.

¶28

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

¶29

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

SDi.K.SAILESHI

¶31

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Go

SECTION OFFICER

One CC to Sri G.L.Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for General Administration Department, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶36

Two CCs to GP for N/unicipal Administration and Urban Development, Hiqh Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad (OUT) 4. One CC to Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, SC for GHMC (OPUC)

¶37

Two CD Copies

¶38

One Spare Copy

Kj. \ -r:$*=

HIGH COURT

DATED:1610612021

1
<br>t
q 2$ JUllz!]fl
1r
.>. .*

¶43

ORDER

¶44

WP.No.13408 of 2021

¶45

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶46

''l >3^b>r

Panja gutta Hindu Smashana Vatika Parirakshana Samithi and another v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panja gutta Hindu Smashana Vatika Parirakshana Samithi and another v. The State of Telangana and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Aishwarya Infra Vs Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority

Mohammed Jahangir Vs The State of Telangana and 10 others

Srinivas Sajjanapu Vs State of Telangana

Sri Pallapu sanjiv Vs The State of Telangana

Abdul Hameed Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Mande Lalitha Vs Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited