Petitioner sought writ mandamus against demolition notice and interim stay. Court allowed withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it accordingly.
Withdrawal of the Writ petition permitted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A,ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:12416 OF 2021
Between:
G. V. V.Rajendra Prasad, S/o Venkateswararao, Aged 46years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.2-23-S-68, Aditya Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
,..PETITIONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of ihe Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the HighCourt may be pleasedto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the respondents in tryingto demolish the petitioners property bearing H.No.2-23-S-68, Aditya Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad,Telangana State, which was constructed by duly obtaining Building Permit Order bearingPermit No.3lC24l14331l2O1B d|.0410912018 by issuing Notice No.68/3/UC/W.N0.123/C24lKZlGHMCl2021 dt.O5lo5l202'1 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation oflaw and the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and consequently set aside theNotice No.6B/3/UC/W.NO.123lC-24lKZlGHMC12021 dt.0510512021 issued by the3rd respondent.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents not to demolish / interfere in thepetitionersproperty bearing H.No.2-23-S-68, Aditya Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Telangana State, without following due process of law till the disposal of the main writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. SAI KRISHNA MOHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY,
SC FOR GHMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEI( REDDY
T{'RIT PETI TION No. 1 2476 of 2021
OI{DER:
Mr. K.Sai Mohan Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner, adciressecl a letter, d.ated, Q7.06.2021, to the Registry seeking withdrawal of the Writ petition.
Permission is granted
Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
The miscellaneous petitions pendhg, if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \lt/ \
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 2 . One CC to Sri K. Sai Krishna Mohan Rao, Advocate tOpUCl 'Two ccs to Gp for Municipar Administratibn ina uroln o-"Groprent, High court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad. IOUii- -- 43. Two 9ru CD 99 Copiesto Sri Sampath prabhdkar Reddy, SC ior GHMC, Advocate tOpUCl . One Spare Copy
SIl')
gbr
.\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1710612021
ORDER
WP.No.12416 of 202'l
{ tiE sIA 16
o
O 2 3 JUil! ?021
i:.-
Sit.',
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G. V. V.Rajendra Prasad
The State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Justice A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
