Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging inaction in recruitment of outsourcing posts. Petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file fresh one.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILI
WRlT PETITION NO: 106 OF 2021
Between:
S. R. na1u. S/o. R. KaluEmAqe. 28 years,Occ. Unemployee Fl/o. 12-19,Posh Colony, 3rd Floor, Jillelguda,Saroor [',lagarlr/andal' R.R.District - qg009z --
Nagella Village and Post,Madigula Mandal,R R'District -509327
,..PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or orders, moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 1 to 6 in not considering the representations of the petitioners dated 01-07-2020 and 29-10-2020 for the recruitment of the non teaching outsourcing posts in the respondent No.7 organization with the local district eligible candidates is illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of naturaljustice and also violative of the Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent Nos.'1 to 6 to recruit eligible local district candidates by inviting online applications from the eligible local dlstrict candidates.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent 1 to 6 to terminate the respondent Nos. 8 to 12 herein who are non-local outsourcing employees in the respondent No. 7 organization as the contract period is over pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent 1 to 6 to consider the representations dt. 01-O7-2020,29-10-2020 of the petitioners to follow the due process of law in appointing the non teaching outsourcing posts in the respondent No.7 organization with the local district eligible candidates pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SMT. GAYATHRI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No. 5 : SRI VIJAYA BHASKAR MOOLA, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4, 6 to 12:-----
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI
wRlT PETITION No.106 of 2021
ORDER:
Leorned counsel oppeoring for thepetitionerrequeslsthe Couri to topermit thepetilioner lowithdrowthis writ petiiion writ petiiionwiih oo liberty 1o file fresh writpetition.
Couri to topermit thepetilioner lowithdrowthis writ petiiion writ petiiionwiih oo
In view of lhe obove submisslon, thewrit petitionis dismissed
os withdrown bygronting llberty osproyed for. No cosis.
Pending miscelloneouspetitions,if ony,sholl stond closed.
SD/-V.SUDHA
//TRUE copy// ASSlsrANr ffisrnln secrroil ornceR
To,
Sl11
\
^,-
t.
HIGH COURT
DA'lED:0710412021
ORDER
,?d
.J \ WP.No.106 of 2021
s. i -:'l.t
r a{$
{i
i/
xu:92
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to recruit local district candidates for non-teaching outsourcing posts.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Kalyan Chakravarthy and others
State of Telangana
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
