Writ petition seeking directions for action against illegal construction was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Petitioner granted liberty to avail alternate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A,ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 10398 OF 2021
Between:
K. S Ravi Kumar, S/o Late K. S Anandam, Aged about 47years, Occupation. Private Employee, R/o H No1 1-1-338. It/ylargadda,near Railway Track Seetaphalmandi, Secunderabad
AND
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHighCourt may be pleasedto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in thenature of l,4andamus, declaring the inaction of respondents moreparticularlythat of respondents 3 and 4 in not initiating any action onpetitioner's written complaintdated29.03.2021against respondents 5 and 6 making illegal constructionsin Plot with H,No 11-1-355/8,near Railway Track, [rlylargadda, seetaphalmandi,secunderabad in deviation to sanction plan vide Permit No. 3lc2sl18B3Bl2019 dated 30.12.2019without there being any permission obtained from official respondents that tooduringLockdownperiod, contrary to the Judgment of Honorablesupremecourt of lndia in civil AppealNo 33471:i2 dated 29.02.2012 as beingas beinglllegal,Arbitrary UnConstitutional, being violative of Articles21 and 300A, againstthe Letter and spirit of catenaof Judgments rendered by thisHonorable court as well that of Honorable supreme Cou-rl of lndia apart from beingviolative of principles of natural Justice and Fair play, and consequently demolishthe illegalstructure raised.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151cPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the Highcourt may be pleasedto direct respondents 2 1o 4 loensure action on respondents5 and 6 from proceedingany further with illegal constructionover and above the Plot withH. 11-1-355/8,near iailway Track,-Mylargadda,Seetaphalmandi, Secunderabad in deviation to sanction 2911883812019 dated30.12.201 9 in pursuantto complaint plan viiepermit -Nlo.-3lC
dated29.03.2021 againsr respondents5 and 6, pending the disposal of present writ petition.
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRI' M SEKHAR
Counselfor the Respondent No' 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBANDEVELOPMENT
Counselforthe Respondent Nos'2 to 4: SRI' CHATLA MADHU' SC FOR GHMC
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.10398 of 2O2L
ORDER:
{
In view of the letter, dated 02.06.202 1, addressed by the Iearned Counsel for the petitioner to the Registry seeking withdrau,al of the Writ Petition, this case is listed under the caption'for withdrau,al'.
Iu vir:w of the letter, dated 02.06.202 1, the Writ Petilion is dismissed as withdrau'r'r granting libertt' to the petitioner to avail zil I c.rr.-r t ivc rt'med ics avai lat;lc undt:r lau
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closcd. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY// t-
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1 . One CC to Sri. M Sekhar, Advocate [OPUC]
4 Two CD Copies.
PIV
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410612021
1 H 9_ T4 14:
k >
e
oo 16 JUN 20?1 o=
.tr
*
.J ,.
i)
ORDER
WP.No.10398 of 2021
Dismissing the WP As withdrawn Without costs.
b
Itt u
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. S Ravi Kumar
The State of Telangana
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
A. Abhisek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
