A writ petition by an agriculturist seeking writ of mandamus for non-passing of orders on representations regarding land revenue was dismissed as the petitioner voluntarily withdrew the petition.
Withdrawal of writ; dismissal of petition as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE I-ION'BLE SRIJUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
wRtT PET|T|ON NO. 10383 0F 2021
Between:
Akula Narsaiah, S/o.Akula Anthaiah, a years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 12-27t1 Rudrangi village andged Mandal,38 Rajanna Sircilla District, Telangana.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particurarry one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider petitioner,s representations dated 231312021 and 241312021 and pass orders and take action in accordance with raw and also declaring the high handed action of the respondents in not passing order on the above representations as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14, 2.1 and 300A of the Constitution of lndia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to directed the Respondents to consider my representation dated 231312021 and 24/312021 pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of equity of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. OM LAW FIRM
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEENRAO
WRIT PETITION o.10383 of2O2l
ORDER:
Learned counsel for thepetitioner seeks leave of thr: Courtto
withdraw the writ petition.
Recording the same, Writ Petition is disrr issed as
withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/. K. ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to M/s. Om Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC] 2. iwo-Cbs to GP forRevenue, HighCourt for the State of Telanganaat Hyderabad. [OUT]
MP
TP {
HIGH COURT
DATED: 171081202,,l
ORDER
STATE I A
1gC
o
fo l.:
$ssL9$t1
i
DE+Pf:
WP.No.10383 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
<-I
I
Akula Narsaiah
The State of Telangana
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
